of great armies than formerly it had been. As
to Prussia, a merely military power, they observed
that one war had enriched her with as considerable
a conquest as France had acquired in centuries.
Russia had broken the Turkish power by which Austria
might be, as formerly she had been, balanced in favour
of France. They felt it with pain, that the two
northern powers of Sweden and Denmark were in general
under the sway of Russia; or that, at best, France
kept up a very doubtful conflict, with many fluctuations
of fortune, and at an enormous expense, in Sweden.
In Holland, the French party seemed, if not extinguished,
at least utterly obscured, and kept under by a stadtholder,
leaning for support sometimes on Great Britain, sometimes
on Prussia, sometimes on both, never on France.
Even the spreading of the Bourbon family had become
merely a family accommodation; and had little effect
on the national politics. This alliance, they
said, extinguished Spain by destroying all its energy,
without adding anything to the real power of France
in the accession of the forces of its great rival.
In Italy, the same family accommodation, the same
national insignificance, were equally visible.
What cure for the radical weakness of the French monarchy,
to which all the means which wit could devise, or
nature and fortune could bestow, towards universal
empire, was not of force to give life, or vigour,
or consistency,—but in a Republic?
Out the word came; and it never went back.
Whether they reasoned, right or wrong, or that there
was some mixture of right and wrong in their reasoning,
I am sure, that in this manner they felt and reasoned.
The different effects of a great military and ambitious
republic, and of a monarchy of the same description,
were constantly in their mouths. The principle
was ready to operate when opportunities should offer,
which few of them indeed foresaw in the extent in
which they were afterwards presented; but these opportunities,
in some degree or other, they all ardently wished for.
When I was in Paris in 1773, the treaty of 1756 between
Austria and France was deplored as a national calamity;
because it united France in friendship with a power
at whose expense alone they could hope any continental
aggrandisement. When the first partition of Poland
was made, in which France had no share, and which
had further aggrandised every one of the three powers
of which they were most jealous, I found them in a
perfect phrensy of rage and indignation: not that
they were hurt at the shocking and uncoloured violence
and injustice of that partition, but at the debility,
improvidence, and want of activity, in their government,
in not preventing it as a means of aggrandisement to
their rivals, or in not contriving, by exchanges of
some kind or other, to obtain their share of advantage
from that robbery.