He owed his complete liberation to one of the worst acts of one of the worst governments that England has ever seen.  In 1671 the Cabal was in power.  Charles II had concluded the treaty by which he bound himself to set up the Roman Catholic religion in England.  The first step which he took toward that end was to annul, by an unconstitutional exercise of his prerogative, all the penal statutes against the Roman Catholics; and in order to disguise his real design, he annulled at the same time the penal statutes against Protestant Non-conformists.  Bunyan was consequently set at large.  In the first warmth of his gratitude, he published a tract in which he compared Charles to that humane and generous Persian king who, though not himself blessed with the light of the true religion, favored the chosen people, and permitted them, after years of captivity, to rebuild their beloved temple.  To candid men, who consider how much Bunyan had suffered, and how little he could guess the secret designs of the court, the unsuspicious thankfulness with which he accepted the precious boon of freedom will not appear to require any apology.

Before he left his prison he had begun the book which has made his name immortal.  The history of that book is remarkable.  The author was, as he tells us, writing a treatise, in which he had occasion to speak of the stages of the Christian progress.  He compared that progress, as many others had compared it, to a pilgrimage.  Soon his quick wit discovered innumerable points of similarity which had escaped his predecessors.  Images came crowding on his mind faster than he could put them into words:  quagmires and pits, steep hills, dark and horrible glens, soft vales, sunny pastures; a gloomy castle, of which the courtyard was strewn with the skulls and bones of murdered prisoners; a town all bustle and splendor, like London on the Lord Mayor’s Day; and the narrow path, straight as a rule could make it, running on uphill and down hill, through city and through wilderness, to the Black River and the Shining Gate.  He had found out—­as most people would have said, by accident; as he would doubtless have said, by the guidance of Providence—­where his powers lay.  He had no suspicion, indeed, that he was producing a masterpiece.  He could not guess what place his allegory would occupy in English literature, for of English literature he knew nothing.  Those who suppose him to have studied the “Fairy Queen,” might easily be confuted, if this were the proper place for a detailed examination of the passages in which the two allegories have been thought to resemble each other.  The only work of fiction, in all probability, with which he could compare his pilgrim, was his old favorite, the legend of Sir Bevis of Southampton.  He would have thought it a sin to borrow any time from the serious business of his life, from his expositions, his controversies, and his lace tags, for the purpose of amusing himself with what he considered merely as a trifle.  It