deep self-conviction and emphatic earnestness of his manner; the corresponding simplicity and energy of his style; the close and logical connection of his thoughts, and the easy graduations by which he opens his lights on the attentive minds of his hearers.  The audience are never permitted to pause for a moment.  There is no stopping to weave garlands of flowers to hang in festoons around a favorite argument.  On the contrary, every sentence is progressive; every idea sheds new light on the subject; the listener is kept perpetually in that sweetly pleasurable vibration with which the mind of man always receives new truths; the dawn advances with easy but unremitting pace; the subject opens gradually on the view, until, rising in high relief in all its native colors and proportions, the argument is consummated by the conviction of the delighted hearer.”

Immediately after the Revolutionary War the State courts were crowded with business, because of the numerous bankruptcies, arising from war habits, the changes in the condition of families, repudiation of debts, false currency, etc.  Marshall was one of the first lawyers who rose to the magnanimity to admit the propriety of a federal judiciary, different from that of the States.  The other lawyers thought it would not do to take the business away from these courts.  They preferred to see the people hanging around Richmond, with their cases undecided and unheard on account of the pressure of business, rather than to concede a national judiciary.  All sorts of novel questions were arising at that time, cases which had no precedents, which the English law-books did not reach, and where the man of native powers, pushing out like Columbus on the unknown, soon developed a sturdy strength and self-reliance the mere popinjay and student of the law could never get.  Among the cases he argued was the British debt case, tried in 1793.  The United States now had its Circuit Court, and Chief-justice Jay presided at Richmond.  The treaty of peace of England provided that the creditors on either side should meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value of all bona fide debts theretofore contracted.  The question was whether debts sequestrated by the Virginia Legislature during the war came under this treaty.  It is said that the Countess of Huntingdon heard the speeches on this case, and said that every one of the lawyers, if in England, would have been given a peerage.  Patrick Henry broke his voice down in this case, and never again could speak with his old force.  Marshall surpassed them all in the cogency of his reasoning.  At that time he was thought to be rather lazy.  He went into the State Legislature in 1782, just before he married.  His personal influence was such in Richmond that, although he was constantly in the minority, he was always elected.  His principal amusement was pitching the quoit, which he did to the end of his days, and could ring the meg, it is said, at a