gives a limitation of the power, as in the case of
the ruling elder, who is limited to ruling as contradistinct
to
laboring in the word and doctrine, 1 Tim.
v. 17.) Now what gross absurdities ensue hereupon!
For, 1. Then the weak as well as the strong,
the ignorant as well as the intelligent, the children
as well as the parents, yea, and the very women as
well as the men, may preach, dispense seals, ordain,
admonish, excommunicate, absolve authoritatively;
(for they are all equally members of the body, one
as well as another, and therefore, as such, have all
alike equal share in the keys and exercise thereof:)
viz. they that are not gifted for these offices,
shall discharge these offices; they that are not called
nor sent of God to officiate, (for God sends not all,)
shall yet officiate in the name of Christ without
calling or sending, contrary to Rom. x., Heb. v. 4.
They that want the common use of reason and discretion
(as children) shall have power to join in the highest
acts of order and jurisdiction: yea, they that
are expressly prohibited
speaking in the churches,
as the
women, 1 Cor. xiv., 1 Tim. ii., shall
yet have the
keys of the kingdom of heaven
hung at their girdles. 2. Then the Church shall
be the steward of Christ, and dispenser of the mysteries
of God authoritatively and properly. But if the
whole Church be the dispenser of the mysteries of
God, what shall be the object of this dispensation?
Not the Church, for according to this opinion she is
the first subject dispensing; therefore it must be
something distinct from the Church, unto which the
Church dispenseth; what shall this be? shall it be
another collateral church? then particular churches
collateral may take pastoral care one of another reciprocally,
and the same churches be both over and under one another;
or shall it be those that are without all churches?
then the ordinances of the gospel, and the dispensation
of them, were not principally bestowed upon the Church
and body of Christ for the good thereof, (which is
directly repugnant to the Scriptures, Eph. iv. 8,
11-13;) but rather for them that are without.
How shall the men, who maintain the principle’s
of the Independents, clearly help themselves out of
these perplexing absurdities?
3. Hereby the body of the people (as Mr. Bayly
well observes in his Dissuasive, chap. ix. page 187)
will be extremely unfitted for, and unwarrantably
taken off from the several duties that lie upon them
in point of conscience to discharge in their general
and particular callings, in spiritual and secular
matters, on the Lord’s days and on their own
days. For, if the ecclesiastical power be in all
the people, then all the people are judges, and at
least have a negative voice in all church matters.
They cannot judge in any cause prudently and conscientiously,
till they have complete knowledge and information of
both the substantials and circumstantials of all those
cases that are brought before them; they must not