contrary to the second table, but against truth and
piety, contrary to the first table of the decalogue.
We have sufficient intimation of the magistrate’s
punitive power in cases against the second table; as
the stubborn and rebellious, incorrigible son, that
was a glutton and a drunkard, sinning against the
fifth commandment, was to be stoned to death, Deut.
xxi. 18-21. The murderer, sinning against the
sixth commandment, was to be punished with death,
Gen. ix. 6; Numb. xxxv. 30-34; Deut. x. 11-13.
The unclean person, sinning against the seventh commandment,
was to be punished with death, Lev. xx. 11, 12, 14,
17, 19-25; and before that, see Gen. xxxviii. 24.
Yea, Job, who is thought to live before Moses, and
before this law was made, intimates that adultery
is a heinous crime, yea, it is an iniquity to be punished
by the judges, Job xxxi. 9,11. The thief, sinning
against the eighth commandment, was to be punished
by restitution, Exod. xxii. 1, 15, &c. The false
witness, sinning against the ninth commandment, was
to be dealt withal as he would have had his brother
dealt with, by the law of retaliation, Deut. xix.
16, to the end of the chapter, &c. Yea, the magistrate’s
punitive power is extended also to offences against
the first table; whether these offences be against
the first commandment, by false prophets teaching
lies, errors, and heresies in the name of the Lord,
endeavoring to seduce people from the true God.
“If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer
of dreams, that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams
shall be put to death, because he hath spoken to turn
you away from the Lord your God, which brought you
out of the land of Egypt,” &c., Deut. xiii.
1-6. From which place Calvin notably asserts
the punitive power of magistrates against false prophets
and impostors that would draw God’s people to
a defection from the true God, showing that this power
also belongs to the Christian magistrate in like cases
now under the gospel.
Yea, in case of such seducement from God, though by
nearest allies, severe punishment was to be inflicted
upon the seducer, Deut. xiii. 6-12. See also
ver. 12, to the end of the chapter, how a city is to
be punished in the like case. And Mr. Burroughs,[27]
in his Irenicum, shows that this place of Deut. xiii.
6, &c., belongs even to us under the gospel.
Or whether these offences be against the second commandment,
the magistrate’s punitive power reaches them,
Deut. xvii. 1-8; Lev. xvii. 2-8; 2 Chron. xvi. 13,
16. “Maachah, the mother of Asa the king,
he removed from being queen, because she had made
an idol in a grove.” Job xxxi. 26-28, herewith
compare Exod. viii. 25, 26. Or whether the offences
be against the third commandment, “And thou shalt
speak unto the children of Israel, saying, Whosoever
curseth God shall bear his sin: and he that blasphemeth
the name of the Lord he shall surely be put to death,
and all the congregation shall certainly stone him,
as well the stranger as he that is born in the land,