an equal opportunity to show the stuff that is in him by the way in which he renders service.  There should, so far as possible, be equality of opportunity to render service; but just so long as there is inequality of service there should and must be inequality of reward.  We may be sorry for the general, the painter, the artist, the worker in any profession or of any kind, whose misfortune rather than whose fault it is that he does his work ill.  But the reward must go to the man who does his work well; for any other course is to create a new kind of privilege, the privilege of folly and weakness; and special privilege is injustice, whatever form it takes.

To say that the thriftless, the lazy, the vicious, the incapable, ought to have the reward given to those who are far-sighted, capable, and upright, is to say what is not true and cannot be true.  Let us try to level up, but let us beware of the evil of levelling down.  If a man stumbles, it is a good thing to help him to his feet.  Every one of us needs a helping hand now and then.  But if a man lies down, it is a waste of time to try to carry him; and it is a very bad thing for every one if we make men feel that the same reward will come to those who shirk their work and to those who do it.

Let us, then, take into account the actual facts of life, and not be misled into following any proposal for achieving the millennium, for re-creating the golden age, until we have subjected it to hard-headed examination.  On the other hand, it is foolish to reject a proposal merely because it is advanced by visionaries.  If a given scheme is proposed, look at it on its merits, and, in considering it, disregard formulas.  It does not matter in the least who proposes it, or why.  If it seems good, try it.  If it proves good, accept it; otherwise reject it.  There are plenty of men calling themselves Socialists with whom, up to a certain point, it is quite possible to work.  If the next step is one which both we and they wish to take, why of course take it, without any regard to the fact that our views as to the tenth step may differ.  But, on the other hand, keep clearly in mind that, though it has been worth while to take one step, this does not in the least mean that it may not be highly disadvantageous to take the next.  It is just as foolish to refuse all progress because people demanding it desire at some points to go to absurd extremes, as it would be to go to these absurd extremes simply because some of the measures advocated by the extremists were wise.

The good citizen will demand liberty for himself, and as a matter of pride he will see to it that others receive the liberty which he thus claims as his own.  Probably the best test of true love of liberty in any country is the way in which minorities are treated in that country.  Not only should there be complete liberty in matters of religion and opinion, but complete liberty for each man to lead his life as he desires,