was made, not unsuccessfully, to extend it wider, under
the direction of Lionel Cranfield, a self-made man
of business from the city; but with such a Court the
task was an impossible one. It was not Bacon’s
fault, though he sadly mismanaged his own private affairs,
that the King’s expenditure was not managed
soberly and wisely. Nor was it Bacon’s
fault, as far as advice went, that James was always
trying either to evade or to outwit a Parliament which
he could not, like the Tudors, overawe. Bacon’s
uniform counsel had been—Look on a Parliament
as a certain necessity, but not only as a necessity,
as also a unique and most precious means for uniting
the Crown with the nation, and proving to the world
outside how Englishmen love and honour their King,
and their King trusts his subjects. Deal with
it frankly and nobly as becomes a king, not suspiciously
like a huckster in a bargain. Do not be afraid
of Parliament. Be skilful in calling it, but don’t
attempt to “pack” it. Use all due
adroitness and knowledge of human nature, and necessary
firmness and majesty, in managing it; keep unruly and
mischievous people in their place, but do not be too
anxious to meddle—“let nature work;”
and above all, though of course you want money from
it, do not let that appear as the chief or real cause
of calling it. Take the lead in legislation.
Be ready with some interesting or imposing points
of reform, or policy, about which you ask your Parliament
to take counsel with you. Take care to “frame
and have ready some commonwealth bills, that may add
respect to the King’s government and acknowledgment
of his care; not wooing bills to make the King
and his graces cheap, but good matter to set the Parliament
on work, that an empty stomach do not feed on humour.”
So from the first had Bacon always thought; so he
thought when he watched, as a spectator, James’s
blunders with his first Parliament of 1604; so had
he earnestly counselled James, when admitted to his
confidence, as to the Parliaments of 1614 and 1615;
so again, but in vain, as Chancellor, he advised him
to meet the Parliament of 1620. It was wise,
and from his point of view honest advice, though there
runs all through it too much reliance on appearances
which were not all that they seemed; there was too
much thought of throwing dust in the eyes of troublesome
and inconvenient people. But whatever motives
there might have been behind, it would have been well
if James had learned from Bacon how to deal with Englishmen.
But he could not. “I wonder,” said
James one day to Gondomar, “that my ancestors
should ever have permitted such an institution as the
House of Commons to have come into existence.
I am a stranger, and found it here when I arrived,
so that I am obliged to put up with what I cannot get
rid of.” James was the only one of our many
foreign kings who, to the last, struggled to avoid
submitting himself to the conditions of an English
throne.