of the body. The right arm is uplifted in a vigorous
movement and holds aloft a blazing torch. The
left hand grasps a tablet on which the date of the
Declaration of Independence appears; this is held
rather close to the body and at a slight angle from
it. The head is that of a handsome, proud and
brave woman. It is crowned by a diadem.
The arrangement of the draperies is, if one may judge
from the pictures, a feature of especial excellence
in the design. There is merit in the disposition
of the peplum or that portion of the draperies flung
back over the left shoulder, the folds of which hang
obliquely (from the left shoulder to the right side
of the waist and thence downward almost to the right
knee,) thus breaking up the monotony of the perpendicular
lines formed by the folds of the tunic beneath.
The movement of the uplifted right arm is characterized
by a certain
elan which, however, does not
suggest violence; the carriage of the head is dignified,
and so far as one may judge from a variety of prints,
the face is fine in its proportions and expression.
I do not find the movement of the uplifted arm violent,
and, on the whole, am inclined to believe the composition
a very good one in its main features. There will
be an undeniable heaviness in the great masses of
drapery, especially as seen from behind, but the illusion
as to the size of the figure created by its elevation
on a pedestal and foundation nearly twice as high
as itself may do much towards obviating this objection.
The background of the figure will be the
... Spacious firmament on high,
With all the blue etherial sky,
And spangled heavens ...
The island is far enough removed from the city so
that no direct comparisons can be made between the
statue and any buildings. Seen from the deck
of a steamer at a distance say of a quarter of a mile,
the horizon, formed by the roofs, towers, spires and
chimneys of three cities, will not appear higher than
the lower half of the pedestal. In other words
the statue will neither be dwarfed nor magnified by
the contiguity of any discordant objects. It
will stand alone. The abstract idea, as has been
said, is noble. The plan of utilizing the statue
as a lighthouse at night does not detract from its
worth in this respect; it may be said to even emphasize
the allegorial sense of the work. “Liberty
enlightening the world,” lights the way of the
sailor in the crowded harbor of the second commercial
city of the world. The very magnitude of the
work typifies, after a manner, the vast extent of our
country, and the audacity of the scheme is not inappropriate
in the place where it is to stand. It may be,
indeed, that when the statue is set up, we shall find
it awkward and offensive, as some critics have already
prophecied: but that it must be so inevitably
does not appear to me to be a logical deduction from
the information we have at hand as to the artist and
his plans. It is freely admitted that no modern