[41:  Duhamel v. Pickering, 2 Starkie, 92.]

[42:  Barker v. Hodgson, 3 M. & S. 270.]

[43:  Liddard v. Lopes, 10 East. 526; Abbot, on Shipping, 596.]

[44:  1 Kent’s Com. 248; The Hiram, 3 Rob.  Adm. 189.]

[45:  1 Kent’s Com., 249.]

[46:  Hadley v. Clarke, 8 T.R. 259; 3 Kent’s Com. 249.]

[47:  Abbot, on Shipping, 599.]

[48:  Pothier, Trait du Cout. de Joc.  No. 140.]

[49:  Story, on Partnership, pp. 447, 448.]

[50:  Griswold v. Waddington, 16 Johns.  Rep.  U.S.]

[51:  Story, on Partnership, 447.]

[52:  Story, on Partnership, 449; Griswold v. Waddington, 15 Johns, 57; 16 Johns, 438.]

[53:  Platt, on Covenants, 588; Doe d. Lord Anglesea v. Ch.  Wardens of Rugely, 6 Q.B. 113, and cases there cited.]

[54:  Cosmopolite, 4 Rob. 10, 11, in note.]

[55:  1 Term.  R. Gist. v. Mason.]

[56:  Per Buller, J. Bell v. Gilson, 1 Bos. v..  Pull.]

[57:  Case of Bella Guidita, cited 1 Rob.  Adm.  Rep. 207.]

[58:  1 Kent, p. 73]

[58:  1 Kent, p. 73]

[59:  Per Eyre, C.J.  Sparenburgh v. Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 168.]

[60:  Sparenburgh v. Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 163.]

[61:  Maria v.  Hall, 2 B.&P. 236.]

[62:  Derry v.  Duchess of Mazarin, 1 Taunt. 147.]

[63:  7 & 8 Vic. c. 66, sec. 16; Mrs. Manning’s Case, 2 D.C.C. 468.]

[64:  The Vriendchap, 6 Rob. 166; the Embden, 1 Rob. 17; the Endraught, 1 Rob. 23.]

[65:  Kent’s Com. vol. i. 74.]

[66:  Case of the Emmanuel, 1 Rob.  Adm.  Rep. 302.]

[67:  Case of Dos Hermanos, 2 Wheaton, 76.]

[68:  1 Wheaton, 46; Rob.  Adm, Rep. iii. 324; the Harmony, the Indian Chief, 3 Rob. 12.]

[69:  The Ocean, 5 Rob. p. 91.]

[70:  The Vigilantia, 1 Rob.  Adm.  Rep. p. 1.]

[71:  The Susa, Rob.  Adm.  Rep. vol. ii. p. 255.]

[72:  Wheaton, vol. ii. p. 71, citing Cranch’s Rep. vol viii. p. 253.]

[73:  1 Kent’s Com. 82, citing Berens v.  Rucker, I W. Bl. 313; and vide infra Chap. iii. under title “Rule of 1756.”]

[74:  The Vigilantia, 1 Rob.  Adm.  Rep. 15.]

[75:  The Success, I Dodson’s Adm.  Rep. 132.]

[76:  I Kent’s Com., p. 85.]

[77:  I Kent’s Com. p. 85.]

[78:  Vrow Margaretha, I Rob.  Adm.  Rep. 338.]

[79:  Esprit des Loix, book 15, c. 2.]

[80:  Vattel, Idem.]

[81:  Wheaton, vol. 2, p. 79.]

[82:  Wheaton, vol. 2, p. 8; Kent, vol. 1, p. 91.]

[83:  Not so, however, in the late Declaration, March 28,1854; sed vide App.]

[84:  Vattel, book 3, chap. 15.]

[85:  Kent, vol.  I, sec. 5, p. 94.]

[86:  4 Rob.  Adm.  Rep. p. 262 (n).]