It is not to be lightly assumed that the spirit of hero-worship is wholly an evil or a necessarily harmful thing.  It has its advantages and rewards as well as its dangers and evils.  The existence of hero-worship in any land reveals a nature in the people that is capable of heroic actions.  Men appreciate and admire that which in a measure at least they are, and more that which they aspire to become.  The recent war revealed how the capacity for heroism of a warlike nature lies latent in every Japanese breast and not in the descendants of the old military class alone.  But it is more encouraging to note that popular appreciation of moral heroes is growing.

Education and religion are bringing forth modern moral heroes.  The late Dr. Neesima, the founder of the Doshisha, is a hero to many even outside the Church.  Mr. Ishii, the father of Orphan Asylums in Japan, promises to be another.  A people that can rear and admire men of this character has in it the material of a truly great nation.

The hero-worshiping characteristic of the Japanese depends on two other traits of their nature.  The first is the reality of strong personalities among them capable of becoming heroes; the second is the possession of a strong idealizing tendency.  Prof.  G.T.  Ladd has called them a “sentimental” people, in the sense that they are powerfully moved by sentiment.  This is a conspicuous trait of their character appearing in numberless ways in their daily life.  The passion for group-photographs is largely due to this.  Sentimentalism, in the sense given it by Prof.  Ladd, is the emotional aspect of idealism.

The new order of society is reacting on the older ideal of a hero and is materially modifying it.  The old-fashioned samurai, girded with two swords, ready to kill a personal foe at sight, is now only the ideal of romance.  In actual life he would soon find himself deprived of his liberty and under the condemnation not only of the law, but also of public opinion.  The new ideal with which I have come into most frequent contact is far different.  Many, possibly the majority, of the young men and boys with whom I have talked as to their aim in life, have said that they desired to secure first of all a thorough education, in order that finally they might become great “statesmen” and might guide the nation into paths of prosperity and international power.  The modern hero is one who gratifies the patriotic passion by bringing some marked success to the nation.  He must be a gentleman, educated in science, in history, and in foreign languages; but above all, he must be versed in political economy and law.  This new ideal of a national hero has been brought in by the order of society, and in proportion as this order continues, and emphasis continues to be laid on mental and moral power, rather than on rank or official position, on the intrinsic rather than on the accidental, will the old ideal fade away and the new ideal take its place.  Among an idealizing