for the use he designed it for; but as some parishes had rights of commonage in the wastes, and many gentlemen and farmers had good houses and farms intermingled with them which they had inherited or held on lease, and as, without including all these, the park would not be large enough for Charles’s satisfaction, the king, who was willing to pay a very high price, expected people to gratify him by parting with their property.  Many did so, but—­like the blacksmith of Brighton who utterly refused to be bought out when George IV. was building his hideous pavilion, and the famous miller of Potsdam, that Mordecai at the gate of Sans Souci—­“a gentleman who had the best estate, with a convenient house and gardens, would by no means part with it, and made a great noise as if the king would take away men’s estates at his own pleasure.”  The case of this gentleman and his many minor adherents soon caused a regular row.  The lord treasurer, Juxon, bishop of London, who accompanied Charles to the scaffold, and other ministers were very averse to the scheme, not only on account of the hostile feeling it had evoked, but because the purchase of the land and making a brick wall of ten miles around it, which was what the king wanted, was a great deal too costly for his depleted exchequer.  However, Charles, with his usual fatal obstinacy, would not hear of abandoning the scheme, and told Lord Cottington, who did his utmost to dissuade him from it, “he was resolved to go through with it, and had already caused brick to be burned and much of the wall to be built.”  This beginning of the wall before people consented to part with their land or common rights, increased the public feeling on the subject, and, happening at a time when public opinion was growing strongly against arbitrary rule, was no doubt one of the circumstances which contributed to Charles’s fall.

George II. and Queen Caroline lived much at Richmond, and the interview between Jeanie Deans and Her Majesty took place here.  Jeanie, it will be remembered, told her ducal friend that she thought the park would be “a braw place for the cows”—­a sentiment similar to that of Mr. Black’s Highland heroine, Sheila, who pronounced it “a beautiful ground for sheep.”

The practice of hunting deer in a park, now quite a thing of the past, appears to have been very prevalent at Richmond during this reign, and apparently was attended with considerable risk.  In a chronicle of 1731 we read: 

“August 13, 1731.  The royal family hunted a stag in Richmond new park:  in the midst of the sport, Sir Robert Walpole’s horse fell with him just before the queen’s chaise, but he was soon remounted, and Her Majesty ordered him to bleed by way of precaution.

“Aug. 28, 1731.  The royal family hunted in Richmond Park, when the Lord Delaware’s lady and Lady Harriet d’Auverquerque, daughter to the earl of Grantham, were overturned in a chaise, which went over them, but did no visible hurt.  Mr. Shorter, one of the king’s huntsmen, had a fall from his horse, and received a slight contusion in his head.