The arrival of the charming Agathe Rouget did not bring happiness to her uncle Descoings; for in the same week (or rather, we should say decade, for the Republic had then been proclaimed) he was imprisoned on a hint from Robespierre given to Fouquier-Tinville.  Descoings, who was imprudent enough to think the famine fictitious, had the additional folly, under the impression that opinions were free, to express that opinion to several of his male and female customers as he served them in the grocery.  The citoyenne Duplay, wife of a cabinet-maker with whom Robespierre lodged, and who looked after the affairs of that eminent citizen, patronized, unfortunately, the Descoings establishment.  She considered the opinions of the grocer insulting to Maximilian the First.  Already displeased with the manners of Descoings, this illustrious “tricoteuse” of the Jacobin club regarded the beauty of his wife as a kind of aristocracy.  She infused a venom of her own into the grocer’s remarks when she repeated them to her good and gentle master, and the poor man was speedily arrested on the well-worn charge of “accaparation.”

No sooner was he put in prison, than his wife set to work to obtain his release.  But the steps she took were so ill-judged that any one hearing her talk to the arbiters of his fate might have thought that she was in reality seeking to get rid of him.  Madame Descoings knew Bridau, one of the secretaries of Roland, then minister of the interior,—­the right-hand man of all the ministers who succeeded each other in that office.  She put Bridau on the war-path to save her grocer.  That incorruptible official—­one of the virtuous dupes who are always admirably disinterested—­was careful not to corrupt the men on whom the fate of the poor grocer depended; on the contrary, he endeavored to enlighten them.  Enlighten people in those days!  As well might he have begged them to bring back the Bourbons.  The Girondist minister, who was then contending against Robespierre, said to his secretary, “Why do you meddle in the matter?” and all others to whom the worthy Bridau appealed made the same atrocious reply:  “Why do you meddle?” Bridau then sagely advised Madame Descoings to keep quiet and await events.  But instead of conciliating Robespierre’s housekeeper, she fretted and fumed against that informer, and even complained to a member of the Convention, who, trembling for himself, replied hastily, “I will speak of it to Robespierre.”  The handsome petitioner put faith in this promise, which the other carefully forgot.  A few loaves of sugar, or a bottle or two of good liqueur, given to the citoyenne Duplay would have saved Descoings.

This little mishap proves that in revolutionary times it is quite as dangerous to employ honest men as scoundrels; we should rely on ourselves alone.  Descoings perished; but he had the glory of going to the scaffold with Andre Chenier.  There, no doubt, grocery and poetry embraced for the first time in the flesh; although they have, and ever have had, intimate secret relations.  The death of Descoings produced far more sensation than that of Andre Chenier.  It has taken thirty years to prove to France that she lost more by the death of Chenier than by that of Descoings.