This was far-fetched for a journal that had long insisted upon the absolute incapacity of the black race.  Proximity of dates, however, permits another interpretation of Hotze’s editorial of November 10, and indeed of the project of arming the slaves, though this, early in the spring of 1865, was actually provided for by law.  On November 11, Slidell, Mason and Mann addressed to the Powers of Europe a communication accompanying a Confederate “Manifesto,” of which the blockade had long delayed transmissal.  This “Manifesto” set forth the objects of the Southern States and flatly demanded recognition: 

“’All they ask is immunity from interference with their internal peace and prosperity and to be left in the undisturbed enjoyment of their inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which their common ancestry declared to be the equal heritage of all parties to the Social compact[1249].’”

Russell replied, November 25: 

“Great Britain has since 1783, remained, with the exception of a short period, connected by friendly relations with both the Northern and the Southern States.  Since the commencement of the Civil War which broke out in 1861, Her Majesty’s Government have continued to entertain sentiments of friendship equally for the North and for the South; of the causes of the rupture Her Majesty’s Government have never presumed to judge; they deplored the commencement of this sanguinary struggle, and anxiously look forward to the period of its termination.  In the meantime they are convinced that they best consult the interests of peace, and respect the rights of all parties by observing a strict and impartial Neutrality.  Such a Neutrality Her Majesty has faithfully maintained and will continue to maintain[1250].”

If The Index did indeed hope for results from the “Manifesto,” and had sought to bolster the appeal by dilating on a Southern plan to “let the slaves win their freedom,” the answer of Russell was disappointing.  Yet at the moment, in spite of the effect of Lincoln’s re-election, the current of alleged expert military opinion was again swinging in favour of the South.  The Times scored Russell’s answer, portraying him as attempting to pose as “Our Mutual Friend”: 

“The difficulty, of course, was to be polite to the representatives of the Confederate States without appearing rude to the United States; and, on the other hand, to acknowledge the authority of the United States without affronting the dignity of the Confederates.  Between these two pitfalls Lord Russell oscillates in his letter, and now puts his foot a little bit in the hole on one side, and then, in recovering himself gets a little way into the hole on the other side.  In this way he sways to and fro for a minute or two, but rights himself at last, and declares he has hitherto stood upright between the two pitfalls, and he will continue to do so....  Lord Russell