“Many persons in the United States talk of a dissolution of the Union, but few believe in it....  All this is mere bravado and empty talk.  It means nothing.  The Union is dear to all Americans, whatever they may say to the contrary....  There is no present danger to the Union, and the violent expressions to which over-ardent politicians of the North and South sometimes give vent have no real meaning.  The ‘Great West,’ as it is fondly called, is in the position even now to arbitrate between North and South, should the quarrel stretch beyond words, or should anti-slavery or any other question succeed in throwing any difference between them which it would take revolvers and rifles rather than speeches and votes to put an end to[33].”

The slavery controversy in America had, in short, come to be regarded in England as a constant quarrel between North and South, but of no immediate danger to the Union.  Each outbreak of violent American controversy produced a British comment sympathetic with the North.  The turmoil preceding and following the election of Lincoln in 1860, on the platform of “no extension of slavery,” was very generally noted by the British press and public, as a sign favourable to the cause of anti-slavery, but with no understanding that Southern threat would at last be realized in definite action.  Herbert Spencer, in a letter of May 15, 1862, to his American friend, Yeomans, wrote, “As far as I had the means of judging, the feeling here was at first very decidedly on the side of the North[34] ...”  The British metropolitan press, in nearly every issue of which for at least two years after December, 1860, there appeared news items and editorial comment on the American crisis, was at first nearly unanimous in condemning the South[35].  The Times, with accustomed vigour, led the field.  On November 21, 1860, it stated: 

“When we read the speech of Mr. Lincoln on the subject of Slavery and consider the extreme moderation of the sentiments it expresses, the allowance that is made for the situation, for the feelings, for the prejudices, of the South; when we see how entirely he narrows his opposition to the single point of the admission of Slavery into the Territories, we cannot help being forcibly struck by the absurdity of breaking up a vast and glorious confederacy like that of the United States from the dread and anger inspired by the election of such a man to the office of Chief Magistrate....  We rejoice, on higher and surer grounds, that it [the election] has ended in the return of Mr. Lincoln.  We are glad to think that the march of Slavery, and the domineering tone which its advocates were beginning to assume over Freedom, has been at length arrested and silenced.  We rejoice that a vast community of our own race has at length given an authoritative expression to sentiments which are entertained by everyone in this country.  We trust to see the American Government employed in tasks more worthy of a