[Footnote 352:  Bancroft’s account, Seward, II, pp. 197-203, states that Pickens was absent from Charleston.  Bunch’s account privately was that he and Belligny thought Pickens “totally unfit to be intrusted with anything in which judgment and discretion are at all necessary.” (Lyons Papers.  Bunch to Lyons, Aug. 16, 1861.)]

[Footnote 353:  Bancroft, Seward, II, p. 198.]

[Footnote 354:  Lyons Papers.  Bunch to Lyons.]

[Footnote 355:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 4.  Adams to Russell, Sept. 3, 1861.]

[Footnote 356:  Ibid., No. 2.  Lyons to Russell, Aug. 19, 1861.]

[Footnote 357:  Russell Papers.  Bunch to Lyons, Aug. 18, 1861.  Copy in Lyons to Russell, Aug. 31, 1861.]

[Footnote 358:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on the Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 7.  Lyons to Russell, Aug. 23, 1861.]

[Footnote 359:  Lyons Papers.  Bunch to Lyons, June 23, 1861.]

[Footnote 360:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on the Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 15.  Inclosures.  Bunch to Lyons, Sept. 30, 1861.]

[Footnote 361:  Ibid., “Correspondence respecting International Maritime Law.”  No. 39.  Lyons to Russell.]

[Footnote 362:  Palmerston MS. Russell to Palmerston, Sept. 6, 1861.]

[Footnote 363:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on the Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 6.  Russell to Cowley, Sept. 7, 1861.]

[Footnote 364:  Russell Papers.  Cowley to Russell.  Private.  Sept. 17, 1861.]

[Footnote 365:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 10.  Cowley to Russell, Sept. 10, 1861.]

[Footnote 366:  F.O., France, Vol. 1396.  No. 1112.  Cowley to Russell, Sept. 10, 1861.  Also Russell Papers.  Cowley to Russell.  Private.  Sept. 10, 1861.]

[Footnote 367:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on the Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 9.  Russell to Adams, Sept. 9, 1861.]

[Footnote 368:  Ibid., No. 8.  Two days later, September 11, Russell wrote to Palmerston that Motley was ignorant of Seward’s intentions, and that the Queen wished a modification of the “phrase about not being prepared to recognize,” but that he was against any change.  Palmerston MS.]

[Footnote 369:  Ibid., No. 12.  Adams to Russell.]

[Footnote 370:  Russell to Lyons, Sept. 13, 1861. (Cited in Newton, Lyons, I, p. 52.)]

[Footnote 371:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence on the Withdrawal of Bunch’s Exequatur.”  No. 11.  Russell to Lyons, Sept. 14, 1861.]

[Footnote 372:  Palmerston MS. Russell to Palmerston, Sept. 19, 1861.]