[Footnote 290:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence respecting International Maritime Law.”  No. 12.  Marked “Received,” June 17.]

[Footnote 291:  F.O., Am., Vol. 765.  No. 262.  Lyons to Russell, June 8, 1861.  Also Russell Papers, June 10, 1861.  This disinclination to act extended also to the matter of getting in touch with the South, which they also postponed.  It appeared that Mercier was instructed to order the French Consul at New Orleans to go in person to President Davis.  Both diplomats were very fearful of an “outbreak” from Seward on this planned proposal to the Confederacy.]

[Footnote 292:  F.O., France, Vol. 1376.  No. 35.  Draft.  “Seen by Ld.  Palmerston and the Queen.”]

[Footnote 293:  In Washington, so different was the point of view, Lyons and Mercier were now convinced they could not let Seward know of the proposal to be made to the South.  They feared he would send them their passports.  Mercier in informal talk had explained to Seward his instructions on the Declaration of Paris in so far as the North was concerned.  Lyons and Mercier now planned a joint visit and representation to Seward—­that which was actually attempted on June 15—­but were decided to say nothing about the South, until they learned the effect of this “joint proposal.”  F.O., Am., Vol. 765.  No. 262.  Lyons to Russell, June 8, 1861.]

[Footnote 294:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence respecting International Maritime Law.”  No. 10.  Russell to Grey, June 12, 1861.]

[Footnote 295:  Stoeckl was writing his Government that the state to which the negotiation had come was full of danger and might lead to a serious quarrel.  He thought Russia should keep out of it until results were clearer.  On this report Gortchakoff margined “C’est aussi mon avis.” (Russian Archives, Stoeckl to F.O., June 12-24, 1861.  No. 1359.)]

[Footnote 296:  F.O., Am., Vol. 766.  No. 278.]

[Footnote 297:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence respecting International Maritime Law.”  No. 14.  Lyons to Russell, June 17, 1861.  “Recd.  June 30.”  It was in this interview that Lyons discovered Seward’s misconception as to the position of the proposed negotiation, and made clear to Seward that he had no instructions to sign a convention.]

[Footnote 298:  F.O., Am., Vol. 766.  No. 284.]

[Footnote 299:  Russell Papers.  Lyons to Russell, June 18, 1861.]

[Footnote 300:  Ibid., Lyons to Russell, June 21, 1861.]

[Footnote 301:  Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords, Vol.  XXV.  “Correspondence respecting International Maritime Law.”  No. 22.  Writing privately on the same day Lyons comments on Mercier’s “extreme caution” in his relations with Seward.  Lyons implied that all this personal, rather than official communication of documents to Seward was Mercier’s idea, and that he, Lyons, doubted the wisdom of this course, but had agreed to it because of the desire to act in perfect harmony with France.  Russell Papers, Lyons to Russell, July 8, 1861.]