him sometimes too far into raillery, in which he sometimes
shewed more wit than discretion. He went over
to the court party when the war was like to break
out, and was much in the late king’s councils
and confidence during the war, though he was always
of the party that pressed the king to treat, and so
was not in good terms with the queen. The late
king recommended him to this king as the person on
whose advices he wished him to rely most, and he was
about the king all the while that he was beyond sea,
except a little that he was ambassador in Spain; he
managed all the king’s correspondences in England,
both in the little designs that the cavaliers were
sometimes engaged in, and chiefly in procuring money
for the king’s subsistence, in which Dr. Sheldon
was very active; he had nothing so much before his
eyes as the king’s service and doated on him
beyond expression: he had been a sort of governor
to him and had given him many lectures on the politics
and was thought to assume and dictate too much ...
But to pursue Clarendon’s character: he
was a man that knew England well, and was lawyer good
enough to be an able chancellor, and was certainly
a very incorrupt man. In all the king’s
foreign negotiations he meddled too much, for I have
been told that he had not a right notion of foreign
matters, but he could not be gained to serve the interests
of other princes. Mr. Fouquet sent him over a
present of 10,000 pounds after the king’s restoration
and assured him he would renew that every year, but
though both the king and the duke advised him to take
it he very worthily refused it. He took too much
upon him and meddled in everything, which was his
greatest error. He fell under the hatred of most
of the cavaliers upon two accounts. The one was
the act of indemnity which cut off all their hopes
of repairing themselves of the estates of those that
had been in the rebellion, but he said it was the
offer of the indemnity that brought in the king and
it was the observing of it that must keep him in,
so he would never let that be touched, and many that
had been deeply engaged in the late times having expiated
it by their zeal of bringing home the king were promoted
by his means, such as Manchester, Anglesey, Orrery,
Ashley, Holles, and several others. The other
thing was that, there being an infinite number of
pretenders to employments and rewards for their services
and sufferings, so that the king could only satisfy
some few of them, he upon that, to stand between the
king and the displeasure which those disappointments
had given, spoke slightly of many of them and took
it upon him that their petitions were not granted;
and some of them having procured several warrants
from the secretaries for the same thing (the secretaries
considering nothing but their fees), he who knew on
whom the king intended that the grant should fall,
took all upon him, so that those who were disappointed
laid the blame chiefly if not wholly upon him.
He was apt to talk very imperiously and unmercifully,
so that his manner of dealing with people was as provoking
as the hard things themselves were; but upon the whole
matter he was a true Englishman and a sincere protestant,
and what has passed at court since his disgrace has
sufficiently vindicated him from all ill designs’
(Supplement, ed. Foxcroft, pp. 53-6).