even to the lowest. And I may also mention here
that I have slept in the veranda of a farmer’s
house, in which members of the family slept close
to some of my people, who were of the toddy-drawer
caste above alluded to, and who, I am sure, were quite
as welcome as members of their own caste would have
been. But as regards all these matters concerning
the inner life of the people, we know nothing, unless
we actually live amongst them, and sleep in their houses,
and, in fact, see the people at home; and as it is
extremely difficult to find anyone who has done anything
of the kind, it naturally follows that it is almost
impossible to find anything like reliable sources of
information regarding native habits throughout India.
You may, it is true, stuff your very soul with information
of some sort or other, if you go about asking questions,
but if you do you will find yourself much in the same
predicament that Johnson found himself in his tour
to the Hebrides; and the reader may recollect that
the worthy doctor very soon found that nothing could
be more vague, unsatisfactory, and uncertain than the
answers of an unsophisticated simple people, who were
not much in the habit of being asked questions of
any sort. However, the reader may, in the meantime,
reasonably infer that the conduct of the people in
the rural districts of India, and situated under similar
circumstances, would not materially differ, as regards
matters of caste, from the practice as existing in
Manjarabad. And should that turn out to be the
case, it is plain that those notions, as regards the
practice of caste, which have been so industriously
circulated in England, are almost entirely false.
I have said that I proposed inquiring, further, whether
there are not some compensating advantages in this
division of the people into castes which tend, in
a great measure, to neutralize the prejudicial effects
that arise from people’s sympathies and feelings
being more or less confined to members of their own
caste, instead of being distributed over the human
race considered as a whole. Now, it is perfectly
true that the tendency of caste is to weaken the claim
that humanity in general has on an individual; but
though the claim of society in general is weakened,
it must be remembered that the claims of each caste
on the members of it are strengthened. And though
this fact may militate against an enlarged and Christian
philanthropy, the aggregate force of claims will be
found to amount to a much larger sum than if one part
of a society had no more claim on a man than another.
A man of one caste would not, for instance, perhaps
feel that a man of another caste had much claim on
him; but he would distinctly and strongly feel that
a member of his own caste had. And every caste
acting on the same principle of supporting and helping
its members, I am convinced that the aggregate force
of assistance rendered must be greater than in a country
where there is little or no caste principle.