Everybody voted, whether Fabian or not; and Mrs. Besant and Bland
   carried their resolution by 47 to 19, Morris’s rider being subsequently
   rejected by 40 to 27.”

A short contemporary report written by Mrs. Besant was published in “To-day” for October, 1886, from which it appears that “Invitations were sent out to all Socialist bodies in London,” and that the irregularity of the proceedings alluded to by Shaw was intentional.  The minutes of the proceedings treat the meeting as in ordinary course, but it is plain from Mrs. Besant’s report that it was an informal attempt to clear the air in the Socialist movement as well as in the Society itself.

In order to avoid a breach with Mrs. Wilson and her Fabian sympathisers, it was resolved to form a Fabian Parliamentary League, which Fabians could join or not as they pleased; its constitution, dated February, 1887, is given in full in Tract No. 41; here it is only necessary to quote one passage which describes the policy of the League and of the Society, a policy of deliberate possibilism:—­

“The League will take active part in all general and local elections.  Until a fitting opportunity arises for putting forward Socialist candidates to form the nucleus of a Socialist party in Parliament, it will confine itself to supporting those candidates who will go furthest in the direction of Socialism.  It will not ally itself absolutely with any political party; it will jealously avoid being made use of for party purposes; and it will be guided in its action by the character, record, and pledges of the candidates before the constituencies.  In Municipal, School Board, Vestry, and other local elections, the League will, as it finds itself strong enough, run candidates of its own, and by placing trustworthy Socialists on local representative bodies it will endeavour to secure the recognition of the Socialist principle in all the details of local government.”

Its history is narrated in the same Tract:—­

“Here you have the first sketch of the Fabian policy of to-day.  The Parliamentary League, however, was a short-lived affair.  Mrs. Wilson’s followers faded away, either by getting converted or leaving us.  Indeed, it is a question with us to this day whether they did not owe their existence solely to our own imaginations.  Anyhow, it soon became plain that the Society was solidly with the Executive on the subject of political action, and that there was no need for any separate organization at all.  The League first faded into a Political Committee of the Society, and then merged silently and painlessly into the general body.”

Amongst the lecturers of the autumn of 1886 were H.H.  Champion on the Unemployed, Mrs. Besant on the Economic Position of Women, Percival Chubb, Bernard Shaw on “Socialism and the Family”—­a pencil note in the minute book in the lecturer’s handwriting says, “This was one of Shaw’s most outrageous performances”—­and, in the absence of the Rev. Stopford Brooke, another by Shaw on “Why we do not act up to our principles,”