See Fabian Tract 147 “Capital and Compensation.”

Chapter X

The Policy of Expansion:  1907-12

Statistics of growth—­The psychology of the Recruit—­Famous Fabians—­The Arts Group—­The Nursery—­The Women’s Group—­Provincial Fabian Societies—­University Fabian Societies—­London Groups revived—­Annual Conferences—­The Summer School—­The story of “Socialist Unity”—­The Local Government Information Bureau—­The Joint Standing Committee—­Intervention of the International Socialist Bureau.

The episode described in the last chapter, which took place during the years 1906 to 1908, was accompanied by many other developments in the activities of the Society which must now be described.  In the first place the membership grew at an unprecedented rate.  In the year ended March, 1905, 67 members were elected.  Next year the number was 167, to March, 1907, it was 455, to March, 1908, 817, and to March, 1909, 665.  This was an enormous accession of new blood to a society which in 1904 had only 730 members in all.  In 1909 the Society consisted of 1674 men and 788 women, a total of 2462; of these 1277 were ordinary members residing in or near London, 343 scattered elsewhere in the United Kingdom, 89 abroad; 414 were members of provincial Societies and 339 of University Societies.  There were in addition about 500 members of local Fabian Societies who were not also members of the London Society, and the Associates numbered 217.  The income from subscriptions of all sorts was L473 in 1904 and L1608 in 1908, the high-water mark in the history of the Society for contributions to the ordinary funds.

Of course there is all the difference in the world between a new member and an old.  The freshly elected candidate attends every meeting and reads every word of “Fabian News.”  He begins, naturally, as a whole-hearted admirer and is profoundly impressed with the brilliance of the speakers, the efficiency of the organisation, the ability of the tracts.  A year or two later, if he has any restlessness of intellect, he usually becomes a critic:  he wants to know why there are not more brightly written tracts, explanatory of Socialism and suitable for the unconverted:  he complains that the lectures are far less interesting than they used to be, that the debates are footling, the publications unattractive in appearance and too dull to read.  A few years later he either settles down into a steady-going member, satisfied to do what little he can to improve this unsatisfactory world; or else, like Mr. Wells, he announces that the Society is no longer any good:  once (when he joined) it was really important and effective:  its methods were all right:  it was proclaiming a fresh political gospel.  But times have changed, whilst the Society has only grown old:  it has done its work, and missed its opportunity for more.  It is no longer worthy of his support.