But they brought with them neither certain loathsome diseases nor Socialism. All of these are likewise the results of immorality—moral and political—and of a type of decadent civilization still prevalent on the Continent of Europe and at that time threatening to gain a foothold even in England. It was this last-named threat from which the founders of the American nation were wise and energetic enough to escape, even though their escape meant going into the hardships of an unknown and almost uninhabited wilderness.
Socialism is not only essentially un-American, but it is essentially undemocratic. A democracy means a government by public opinion, and this opinion is the result of the co-operative impulse or community feeling of the people of a free country—a people who are given the opportunity to think for themselves, and are not thought for by a divinely constituted government. As Thomas Jefferson maintained, liberty is not a privilege granted by a government, but government is a responsibility delegated to its officers by the people. “On this distinction hangs all the philosophy of democracy."[5] The people must decide questions for themselves and make their common will known through the representative organs of a government which is after all only the instrument intended to produce the best expression and administration of this public will.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 5: David Saville Muzzey, Thomas
Jefferson, p. 311.
“Generally speaking, one may say
of the German soldier that he is
normally good-natured and is not disposed
to do injury to harmless
people, so long as he finds no obstacles
put in his prescribed way.
But once disturbed, he becomes frightful,
because he lacks any
higher capacity of discrimination; because
he merely does his duty
and recognizes no such thing as individual
conscience and, besides,
when he is excited becomes at once blind
and super-nervous.” “The
Germans are, indeed, a good-natured people,
born to blind obedience
and humble willingness to let others do
their thinking for them.”
Wilhelm Mühlon, The Vandal of Europe,
pages 172 and 251.]
III
ITS CONFLICT WITH THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY AND RELIGION