He who informed your Majesty of the matter contained in the fifth decree, namely, that when appeal is made to the royal Audiencia in cases of fuerca, [41] I do not allow the notaries to give an account thereof; and that I seize the writs and records of proceedings, so that they cannot be issued, the Audiencia having requested me in vain to do otherwise—­whoever, I say, gave this account to your Majesty did me greater injury than any of the others.  For not only is this not so, but I even urge the notary to give a report; and I am so far from [what has been said] to the contrary, that I assure your Majesty that I much regretted the suppression of the Audiencia.  For I was very glad that, whenever I denied anything on appeal, the Audiencia examined my reasons therefor; and, whatever was determined there, my conscience was freed and at rest.  Moreover, I always accepted, without making any objection, the decisions of the Audiencia; for I would consider it a grievous offense to deny your Majesty’s right to make the final decision in cases of fuerca, and would not presume to contradict it in any manner whatsoever.  If he who made that report based it on two cases which came up—­one when they erased my name from the prayer at the mass of the Audiencia, and substituted their own names; the other when, in an investigation, they claimed the right to examine the proceedings which had been conducted in secret—­in these two cases I confess that I refused to give up the records.  I did so in one instance because there were therein very secret matters touching the office of the Inquisition, of which I was then in charge.  When they commanded that report of this case be given, I said that it would be furnished in so far as concerned the chaplain of the said Audiencia.  This was what they had asked, and claimed the right to try this case.  Nevertheless, they would accept nothing but the entire proceedings; but with this I could not comply, for it would have been impossible to do so without very grave damage to my office.  After considering my reasons therefor, the Audiencia insisted no more in the case.  The other case concerned the general investigation which I had made of the prebendaries and clergy—­two of whom appealed against the sentence which I imposed, stipulating that the tenor thereof be observed as is expressly commanded by the Council of Trent.  They had recourse to the Audiencia; and when an order was given for the record of the case to be presented, I replied that there were secret matters touching the honor of the clergy, which I could not show, but that I would show that part referring to the two ecclesiastics; as they wished their offenses to be known.  Nevertheless, it was not right to exhibit the guilt of the others, as they did not feel that their sentences were unjust.  There were many arguments over this point, and all the theologians of this land said that I was right.  To avoid scandal I openly consented that the two ecclesiastics should appeal to the archbishop. [42] Both then and