the feebler echoes of calumny. He corresponded
with his brethren far and near, answered questions
as Rabbi, explained passages in his Commentary on
the Mishnah or his other writings, entered heartily
into the controversies of the day, discussed the claims
of a new aspirant to the dignity of Messiah, encouraged
the weaker brethren who fell under disfavor because
they had been compelled to become pretended converts
to Islam, showed common-sense and strong intellectual
grasp in every line he wrote, and combined in his
dealings with all questions the rarely associated
qualities, toleration and devotion to the truth.
Yet he felt that his life’s work was still incomplete.
He loved truth, but truth for him had two aspects:
there was truth as revealed by God, there was truth
which God left man to discover for himself. In
the mind of Maimonides, Moses and Aristotle occupied
pedestals side by side. In the “Strong
Hand,” he had codified and given orderly arrangement
to Judaism as revealed in Bible and tradition; he
would now examine its relations to reason, would compare
its results with the data of philosophy. This
he did in his “Guide of the Perplexed”
(Moreh Nebuchim). Maimonides here differed
fundamentally from his immediate predecessors.
Jehuda Halevi, in his Cuzari, was poet more
than philosopher. The Cuzari was a dialogue
based on the three principles, that God is revealed
in history, that Jerusalem is the centre of the world,
and that Israel is to the nations as the heart to
the limbs. Jehuda Halevi supported these ideas
with arguments deduced from the philosophy of his day,
he used reason as the handmaid of theology. Maimonides,
however, like Saadiah, recognized a higher function
for reason. He placed reason on the same level
as revelation, and then demonstrated that his faith
and his reason taught identical truths. His work,
the “Guide of the Perplexed,” written in
Arabic in about the year 1190, is based, on the one
hand, on the Aristotelian system as expounded by Arabian
thinkers, and, on the other hand, on a firm belief
in Scripture and tradition. With a masterly hand,
Maimonides summarized the teachings of Aristotle and
the doctrines of Moses and the Rabbis. Between
these two independent bodies of truths he found, not
contradiction, but agreement, and he reconciled them
in a way that satisfied so many minds that the “Guide”
was translated into Hebrew twice during his life-time,
and was studied by Mohammedans and by Christians such
as Thomas Aquinas. With general readers, the third
part was the most popular. In this part Maimonides
offered rational explanations of the ceremonial and
legislative details of the Bible.