October 14th.  If any one choose to claim that the mineral beauty, the fleshly beauty, the natural moral beauty, is all he covets, he is entitled to his claim.  To be good and true, pure and benevolent in the moral sphere, are high and, so far, legitimate objects in life.  If he deliberately stop here, he is at liberty to do so.  But what he is not entitled to do is to call himself a Christian, or to claim to discharge the functions peculiar to the Christian life.  Natural Law, p. 382.

October 15th.  In dealing with a man of fine moral character, we are dealing with the highest achievement of the organic kingdom.  But in dealing with a spiritual man we are dealing with the lowest form of life in the spiritual world.  To contrast the two, therefore, and marvel that the one is apparently so little better than the other, is unscientific and unjust.  Natural Law, p. 385.

October 16th.  The spiritual man is a mere unformed embryo, hidden as yet in his earthly chrysalis-case, while the natural man has the breeding and evolution of ages represented in his character.  But what are the possibilities of this spiritual organism?  What is yet to emerge from this chrysalis-case?  The natural character finds its limits within the organic sphere.  But who is to define the limits of the spiritual?  Even now it is very beautiful.  Even as an embryo it contains some prophecy of its future glory.  But the point to mark is, that “it doth not yet appear what it shall be.”  Natural Law, p. 386.

October 17th.  The best test for Life is just living.  And living consists, as we have formerly seen, in corresponding with Environment.  Those therefore who find within themselves, and regularly exercise, the faculties for corresponding with the Divine Environment, may be said to live the Spiritual Life.  Natural Law, p. 390.

October 18th.  That the Spiritual Life, even in the embryonic organism, ought already to betray itself to others, is certainly what one would expect.  Every organism has its own reaction upon Nature, and the reaction of the spiritual organism upon the community must be looked for.  In the absence of any such reaction, in the absence of any token that it lived for a higher purpose, or that its real interests were those of the Kingdom to which it professed to belong, we should be entitled to question its being in that Kingdom.  Natural Law, p. 390.

October 19th.  Man’s place in Nature, or his position among the Kingdoms, is to be decided by the characteristic functions habitually discharged by him.  Now, when the habits of certain individuals are closely observed, when the total effect of their life and work, with regard to the community, is gauged, . . . there ought to be no difficulty in deciding whether they are living for the Organic or for the Spiritual; in plainer language, for the world or for God.  Natural Law, p. 391.