to fight it.” And the public, bored by
the diplomatists, said: “Now you’re
talking!” We did not stop to ask our consciences
whether the Prussian assumption that the dominion of
the civilized earth belongs to German culture is really
any more bumptious than the English assumption that
the dominion of the sea belongs to British commerce.
And in our island security we were as little able as
ever to realize the terrible military danger of Germany’s
geographical position between France and England on
her west flank and Russia on her east: all three
leagued for her destruction; and how unreasonable it
was to ask Germany to lose the fraction of a second
(much less Sir Maurice de Runsen’s naive “a
few days’ delay”) in dashing at her Western
foe when she could obtain no pledge as to Western
intentions. “We are now in a state of necessity;
and Necessity knows no law,” said the Imperial
Chancellor in the Reichstag. “It is a matter
of life and death to us,” said the German Minister
for Foreign Affairs to our Ambassador in Berlin, who
had suddenly developed an extraordinary sense of the
sacredness of the Treaty of London, dated 1839, and
still, as it happened, inviolate among the torn fragments
of many subsequent and similar “scraps of paper.”
Our Ambassador seems to have been of Sir Maurice’s
opinion that there could be no such tearing hurry.
The Germans could enter France through the line of
forts between Verdun and Toul if they were really
too flustered to wait a few days on the chance of Sir
Edward Grey’s persuasive conversation and charming
character softening Russia and bringing Austria to
conviction of sin. Thereupon the Imperial Chancellor,
not being quite an angel, asked whether we had counted
the cost of crossing the path of an Empire fighting
for its life (for these Militarist statesmen do really
believe that nations can be killed by cannon shot).
That was a threat; and as we cared nothing about Germany’s
peril, and wouldn’t stand being threatened any
more by a Power of which we now had the inside grip,
the fat remained in the fire, blazing more fiercely
than ever. There was only one end possible to
such a clash of high tempers, national egotisms, and
reciprocal ignorances.
Delicate Position of Mr. Asquith.
It seemed a splendid chance for the Government to
place itself at the head of the nation. But no
British Government within my recollection has ever
understood the nation. Mr. Asquith, true to the
Gladstonian tradition (hardly just to Gladstone, by
the way) that a Liberal Prime Minister should know
nothing concerning foreign politics and care less,
and calmly insensible to the real nature of the popular
explosion, fell back on 1839, picking up the obvious
barrister’s point about the violation of the
neutrality of Belgium, and tried the equally obvious
barrister’s claptrap about “an infamous
proposal” on the jury. He assured us that
nobody could have done more for peace than Sir Edward
Grey, though the rush to smash the Kaiser was the most
popular thing Sir Edward had ever done.