France or Russia was England’s natural enemy.
The Battle of Dorking had an enormous sale;
and the wildest guesses were current as to its authorship.
And its moral was “To arms; or the Germans will
besiege London as they besieged Paris.”
From that time until the present, the British propaganda
of war with Germany has never ceased. The lead
given by The Battle of Dorking was taken up
by articles in the daily press and the magazines.
Later on came the Jingo fever (anti-Russian, by the
way; but let us not mention that just now), Stead’s
Truth About the Navy, Mr. Spenser Wilkinson,
the suppression of the Channel Tunnel, Mr. Robert
Blatchford, Mr. Garvin, Admiral Maxse, Mr. Newbolt,
Mr. Rudyard Kipling, The National Review, Lord
Roberts, the Navy League, the imposition of an Imperialist
Foreign Secretary on the Liberal Cabinet, Mr. Wells’s
War in the Air (well worth re-reading just
now), and the Dreadnoughts. Throughout all these
agitations the enemy, the villain of the piece, the
White Peril, was Prussia and her millions of German
conscripts. At first, in The Battle of Dorking
phase, the note was mainly defensive. But from
the moment when the Kaiser began to copy our Armada
policy by building a big fleet, the anti-German agitation
became openly aggressive; and the cry that the German
fleet or ours must sink, and that a war between England
and Germany was bound to come some day, speedily ceased
to be merely a cry with our Militarists and became
an axiom with them. And what our Militarists
said our Junkers echoed; and our Junker diplomatists
played for. The story of how they manoeuvred
to hem Germany and Austria in with an Anglo-Franco-Russian
combination will be found told with soldierly directness
and with the proud candor of a man who can see things
from his own side only in the article by Lord Roberts
in the current number of The Hibbert Journal
(October, 1914). There you shall see also, after
the usual nonsense about Nietzsche, the vision of “British
administrators bearing the White Man’s Burden,”
of “young men, fresh from the public schools
of Britain, coming eagerly forward to carry on the
high traditions of Imperial Britain in each new dependency
which comes under our care,” of “our fitness
as an Imperial race,” of “a great task
committed to us by Providence,” of “the
will to conquer that has never failed us,” of
our task of “assuming control of one-fifth of
the earth’s surface and the care of one in five
of all the inhabitants of the world.” Not
a suggestion that the inhabitants of the world are
perhaps able to take care of themselves. Not even
a passing recollection when that White Man’s
Burden is in question that the men outside the British
Empire, and even inside the German Empire, are by no
means exclusively black. Only the sancta simplicitas
that glories in “the proud position of England,”
the “sympathy, tolerance, prudence and benevolence
of our rule” in the east (as shown, the Kaiser