them at leisure. The Zooelogical Museum at Cambridge
is indebted to the generosity of Mr. Joshua Bates
for a very fine set of casts taken from the Megatherium
in the British Museum. They are now mounted,
and may be seen in one of the exhibition-rooms of
the building. Large Reptiles, but very unlike
those of the Cretaceous and Jurassic epochs, belonging
chiefly to the types of Turtles, Crocodiles, Pythons,
and Salamanders, existed during the Tertiary epochs.
The wood-cut below represents a gigantic Salamander
of the Tertiary deposits. It is a curious fact,
illustrative of the ignorance of all anatomical science
in those days, that, when the remains of this reptile
(Audrias, as it is now called) were first discovered
toward the close of the seventeenth century, they were
described by old Professor Scheuchzer as the bones
of an infant destroyed by the Deluge, and were actually
preserved, not for their scientific value, but as
precious relics of the Flood, and described in a separate
pamphlet, entitled, “Homo Diluvii Testis.”
Among the Tertiary Reptiles the Turtles seem to have
been a very prominent type, by their size as well
as by their extensive distribution. Their remains
have been found both in the far West and in the East.
The fossil Turtles of Nebraska are well known to American
naturalists; but the Oriental one exceeds them in
size, and is, indeed, the most gigantic representative
of the order known thus far. A man could stand
under the arch of the shield of the old Himalayan
Turtle preserved in the British Museum.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
It would carry me too far, were I to attempt to give
anything more than the most cursory sketch of the
animals of the Tertiary age; and, indeed, they are
so well known, and have been so fully represented in
text-books, that I fear some of my readers may think
even now that I have dwelt too long upon them.
Monkeys were unquestionably introduced upon earth
before the close of the Tertiaries; some bones have
been found in Southern France, and also on Mount Pentelicus
in Greece, in the later Tertiary deposits; but these
remains have not yet been collected in sufficient
number to establish much more than the fact of their
presence in the animal creation at that time.
I do not offer any opinion respecting the fossil human
bones so much discussed recently, because the evidence
is at present too scanty to admit of any decisive judgment
concerning them. It becomes, however, daily more
probable that facts will force us sooner or later
to admit that the creation of man lies far beyond
any period yet assigned to it, and that a succession
of human races, as of animals, have followed one another
upon the earth. It may be the inestimable privilege
of our young naturalists to solve this great problem,
but the older men of our generation must be content
to renounce this hope; we may have some prophetic
vision of its fulfilment, we may look from afar into
the land of promise, but we shall not enter in and
possess it.