God in His universality—­that is, this universal Being which has no limit, no bounds, no particularity—­is a Being which subsists absolutely, and which subsists alone; all else which subsists has its root in this unity, and by this alone subsists.  In thus representing to ourselves this first content we may say that God is absolute substance, the only veritable reality.  For not everything which has a reality has a reality of its own, or subsists by itself.  God is the only absolute reality, and thereby the absolute substance.

If we stop at this abstract thought we have Spinozism, for in Spinozism subjectivity is not yet differentiated from substantiality, from substance as such.  But in the presupposition just made there is also this thought—­God is spirit, absolute and eternal; spirit which comes not forth from itself in differentiation.  This ideality, this subjectivity of spirit, which is transparency, ideality excluding all particular determination, is precisely the universal, pure relation to self, Being which remains absolutely within itself.

If we halt at substance, we fail to grasp this universal under its concrete form.  In its concrete determination spirit always preserves its unity, this unity of its reality which we call substance.  But one should add that this substantiality, the unity of the absolute reality with itself, is but the foundation, but a moment in the determination of God as spirit.  Hence, principally, arises the reproach which is directed against philosophy—­to wit, that philosophy, to be consistent with itself, is necessarily Spinozism, and consequently atheism and fatalism.  But at the beginning we have not yet determinations distinguished one from another as aye and nay.  We have the one but not the other.

Consequently, what we have here is, to start with, content under the form of substance.  Even when we say, “God,” “spirit,” we have only words, indeterminate representations.  The essential point is to know what has been produced in the consciousness.  And that is, first, the simple, the abstract.  Here, in this first simple determination, we have God only under the form of universality.  Only we do not halt at this moment.

Nevertheless, this content remains the foundation of all further developments, for in these developments God comes not forth from His unity.  When God creates the world—­to use the expression of every day—­there comes not into existence an evil, a contrary, existing in itself independently of God.

III.—­GOD EXISTS FOR THOUGHT

This Beginning is an object for us or a content in us.  We possess this object.  Immediately the question arises, Who are we?  We, I, spirit—­here also is a complex being, a multiplied being.  I have perceptions; I see, I hear, etc.  Seeing, hearing; all this is I. Consequently, the precise sense of this question is, Which among these determinations is it in accordance with which this content exists for our minds?  Idea, will, imagination, feeling—­which is the seat, the proper domain of this content, of this object?