The object, then, of this legislation is to be sought not in any public demand for these lands for the use of settlers—­for if they are susceptible of that use the Indians have a clear equity to take allotments upon them—­but in that part of the bill which confirms the mineral entries, or entries for mineral uses, which have been unlawfully made “or attempted to be made on said lands.”  It is evidently a private and not a public end that is to be promoted.  It does not follow, of course, that this private end may not be wholly meritorious and the relief sought on behalf of these persons altogether just and proper.  The facts, as I am advised, are that upon these lands there are veins or beds of asphaltum or gilsonite supposed to be of very great value.

Entries have been made in that vicinity, but upon public lands, which lands have been resold for very large amounts.  It is not important, perhaps, that the United States should in parting with these lands realize their value, but it is essential, I think, that favoritism should have no part in connection with the sales.  The bill confirms all attempted entries of these mineral lands at the price of $20 per acre (a price that is suggestive of something unusual) without requiring evidence of the expenditure of any money upon the claim, or even proof that the claimant was the discoverer of the deposits.

The bill requires “good faith,” but it will be next to impossible for the officers of the Interior Department to show actual knowledge on the part of the claimant of the lines of the reservation.  The case will practically be as to this matter in the hands of the claimant.  But why should good faith at the moment of attempting the entry, without any requirement of expenditure, and followed, it may be, within twenty-four hours by actual notice that he was upon a reservation, give an advantage in the sale of these lands that may represent a very large sum of money?

In the second place, I do not think it wise, without notice even to the Indians, to segregate these lands from their reservation.  It is true, I think, that they hold these lands by an Executive order, with a contract right to take allotments upon them, and that the lands in question are not likely to be sought as an allotment by any Indian.  But the Indians have been placed on this reservation and its boundaries explained to them, and to take these lands in this manner is calculated to excite their distrust and fears, and possibly to create serious trouble.

BENJ.  HARRISON.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, June 20, 1890.

To the House of Representatives: 

I return without my approval the bill (H.R. 3934) “to authorize the board of supervisors of Maricopa County, Ariz., to issue certain bonds in aid of the construction of a certain railroad.”