the life of French villages. But the ways of a
Russian village, where I passed part of my childhood,
fairly resemble those described by Zola.
In the life of the rural population into which
I was plunged everything was impregnated with erotism.
One was surrounded by animal lubricity in all
its immodesty. Contrary to the generally
received opinion, I believe that a child may preserve
his sexual innocence more easily in a town than in
the country. There are, no doubt, many exceptions
to this rule. But the functions of the sexual
life are generally more concealed in the towns
than in the fields. Modesty (whether or not of
the merely superficial and exterior kind) is more
developed among urban populations. In speaking
of sexual things in the towns people veil their
thought more; even the lower class in towns employ
more restraint, more euphemisms, than peasants.
Thus in the towns a child may easily fail to comprehend
when risky subjects are talked of in his presence.
It may be said that the corruption of towns, though
more concealed, is all the deeper. Maybe,
but that concealment preserves children from it.
The town child sees prostitutes in the street
every day without distinguishing them from other
people. In the country he would every day
hear it stated in the crudest terms that such and such
a girl has been found at night in a barn or a ditch
making love with such and such a youth, or that
the servant girl slips every night into the coachman’s
bed, the facts of sexual intercourse, pregnancy,
and childbirth being spoken of in the plainest terms.
In towns the child’s attention is solicited
by a thousand different objects; in the country,
except fieldwork, which fails to interest him,
he hears only of the reproduction of animals and the
erotic exploits of girls and youths. When we say
that the urban environment is more exciting we
are thinking of adults, but the things which excite
the adult have usually no erotic effect on the
child, who cannot, however, long remain asexual when
he sees the great peasant girls, as ardent as
mares in heat, abandoning themselves to the arms
of robust youths. He cannot fail to remark
these frank manifestations of sexuality, though the
subtle and perverse refinements of the town would escape
his notice. I know that in the countries
of exaggerated prudery there is much hidden corruption,
more, one is sometimes inclined to think, than
in less hypocritical countries. But I believe
that that is a false impression, and am persuaded
that precisely because of all these little concealments
which excite the malicious amusement of foreigners,
there are really many more young people in England
who remain chaste than in the countries which
treat sexual relations more frankly. At all events,
if I have known Englishmen who were very debauched
and very refined in vice, I have also known young
men of the same nation, over twenty, who were
as innocent as children, but never a young Frenchman,
Italian, or Spaniard of whom this could be said.”