are admitted alike, all women being equal from
the point of view of motherhood, and indeed the
majority of the women who come to the Asile Michelet
are unmarried, some being girls who have even trudged
on foot from Brittany and other remote parts of France,
to seek concealment from their friends in the hospitable
seclusion of these refuges in the great city.
It is not the least advantage of these institutions
that they shield unmarried mothers and their offspring
from the manifold evils to which they are exposed,
and thus tend to decrease crime and suffering.
In addition to the maternity refuges, there are
institutions in France for assisting with help
and advice those pregnant women who prefer to
remain at home, but are thus enabled to avoid the
necessity for undue domestic labor.
There ought to be no manner of doubt that when, as is the case to-day in our own and some other supposedly civilized countries, motherhood outside marriage is accounted as almost a crime, there is the very greatest need for adequate provision for unmarried women who are about to become mothers, enabling them to receive shelter and care in secrecy, and to preserve their self-respect and social position. This is necessary not only in the interests of humanity and public economy, but also, as is too often forgotten, in the interests of morality, for it is certain that by the neglect to furnish adequate provision of this nature women are driven to infanticide and prostitution. In earlier, more humane days, the general provision for the secret reception and care of illegitimate infants was undoubtedly most beneficial. The suppression of the mediaeval method, which in France took place gradually between 1833 and 1862, led to a great increase in infanticide and abortion, and was a direct encouragement to crime and immorality. In 1887 the Conseil General of the Seine sought to replace the prevailing neglect of this matter by the adoption of more enlightened ideas and founded a bureau secret d’admission for pregnant women. Since then both the abandonment of infants and infanticide have greatly diminished, though they are increasing in those parts of France which possess no facilities of this kind. It is widely held that the State should unify the arrangements for assuring secret maternity, and should, in its own interests, undertake the expense. In 1904 French law ensured the protection of unmarried mothers by guaranteeing their secret, but it failed to organize the general establishment of secret maternities, and has left to doctors the pioneering part in this great and humane public work (A. Maillard-Brune, Refuges, Maternites, Bureaux d’Admission Secrets, comme Moyens Preservatives des Infanticide, These de Paris, 1908). It is not among the least benefits of the falling birth rate that it has helped to stimulate this beneficent movement.
The development of an industrial system which subordinates the human body and the human soul to the thirst for