seem to be that pleasure was experienced in the mild shock of interested surprise and injured modesty which this vision was imagined to cause to a young girl.  It would thus be a comparatively innocent form of psychic defloration.

It is of interest to point out that the sexual symbolism of active flagellation is very closely analogous to this symbolism of exhibitionism.  The flagellant approaches a woman with the rod (itself a symbol of the penis and in some countries bearing names which are also applied to that organ) and inflicts on an intimate part of her body the signs of blushing and the spasmodic movements which are associated with sexual excitement, while at the same time she feels, or the flagellant imagines that she feels, the corresponding emotions of delicious shame.[58] This is an even closer mimicry of the sexual act than the exhibitionist attains, for the latter fails to secure the consent of the woman nor does he enjoy any intimate contact with her naked body.  The difference is connected with the fact that the active flagellant is usually a more virile and normal person than the exhibitionist.  In the majority of cases the exhibitionist’s sexual impulse is very feeble, and as a rule he is either to some degree a degenerate, or else a person who is suffering from an early stage of general paralysis, dementia, or some other highly enfeebling cause of mental disorganization, such as chronic alcoholism.  Sexual feebleness is further indicated by the fact that the individuals selected as witnesses are frequently mere children.

It seems probable that a form of erotic symbolism somewhat similar to exhibitionism is to be found in the rare cases in which sexual gratification is derived from throwing ink, acid or other defiling liquids on women’s dresses.  Thoinot has recorded a case of this kind (Attentats aux Moeurs, 1898, pp. 484, et seq.).  An instructive case has been presented by Moll.  In this case a young man of somewhat neuropathic heredity had as a youth of 16 or 17, when romping with his young sister’s playfellows, experienced sexual sensations on chancing to see their white underlinen.  From that time white underlinen and white dresses became to him a fetich and he was only attracted to women so attired.  One day, at the age of 25, when crossing the street in wet weather with a young lady in a white dress, a passing vehicle splashed the dress with mud.  This incident caused him strong sexual excitement, and from that time he had the impulse to throw ink, perchloride of iron, etc., on to ladies’ white dresses, and sometimes to cut and tear them, sexual excitement and ejaculation taking place every time he effected this. (Moll, “Gutachten ueber einem Sexual Perversen [Besudelungstrieb],” Zeitschrift fuer Medizinalbeamte, Heft XIII, 1900).  Such a case is of considerable psychological interest.  Thoinot considers that in these cases the fleck is a fetich.  That is an incorrect account of