more desire than fear of receiving the experience
again from the same hand. It is true that,
as in all this a precocious sexual element was
doubtless mixed, the same chastisement if inflicted
by her brother would not have seemed so pleasant.”
He goes on to say that the punishment was inflicted
a second time, but that that time was the last,
Mademoiselle Lambercier having apparently noted
the effects it produced, and, henceforth, instead of
sleeping in her room, he was placed in another
room and treated by her as a big boy. “Who
would have believed,” he adds, “that this
childish punishment, received at the age of 8 from
the hand of a young woman of 30, would have determined
my tastes, my desires, my passions, for the rest
of my life?” He remarks that this strange
taste drove him almost to madness, but maintained
the purity of his morals, and the joys of love
existed for him chiefly in imagination. (J.J.
Rousseau, Les Confessions, partie i, livre
i.) It will be seen how all the favoring conditions
of fear, shame, and precocious sexuality were
here present in an extremely sensitive child destined
to become the greatest emotional force of his
century, and receptive to influences which would
have had no permanent effect on any ordinary child.
(When, as occasionally happens, the first sexual
feelings are experienced under the stimulation
of whipping in normal children, no permanent perversion
necessarily follows; Moll mentions that he knows
such cases, Zeitschrift fuer Paedagogie, Psychiatrie,
und Pathologie, 1901.) It may be added that
it is, perhaps, not fanciful to see a certain
inevitableness in the fact that on Rousseau’s
highly sensitive and receptive temperament it was a
masochistic germ that fell and fructified, while
on Regis’s subject, with his more impulsive
ancestral antecedents, a sadistic germ found favorable
soil.
It may be noted that in Regis’s sadistic case the little girl who was the boy’s playmate found scarcely less pleasure in the passive part of whipping than he found in the active. There is ample evidence to show that this is very often the case, and that the attractiveness of the idea of being whipped often even arises spontaneously in children. Lombroso (La Donna Delinquente, p. 404) refers to a girl of 7 who had voluptuous pleasure in being whipped, and Hammer (Monatschrift fuer Harnkrankheiten, 1906, p. 398) speaks of a young girl who similarly experienced pleasure in punishment by whipping. Krafft-Ebing records the case of a girl of between 6 and 8 years of age, never at that time having been whipped or seen anyone else whipped, who spontaneously acquired—how she did not know—the desire to be castigated in this manner. It gave her very great pleasure to imagine a woman friend doing this to her. She never desired to be whipped by a man, though there was no trace of inversion, and she never masturbated until the age of 24, when a marriage engagement was broken off. At the age of 10 this longing