Now, this idea of the identity of the human and the divine is a perfectly familiar Christian idea.
“Thence shall I, approved
A man, for aye removed
From the developed brute; a God though
in the germ."[A]
[Footnote A: Rabbi Ben Ezra.]
This idea is involved in the ordinary expressions of religious thought. But, nevertheless, both theology and philosophy shrink from giving to it a clear and unembarrassed utterance. Instead of rising to the sublime boldness of the Nazarene Teacher, they set up prudential differences between God and man—differences not of degree only but of nature; and, in consequence, God is reduced into an unknowable absolute, and man is made incapable not only of moral, but also of intellectual life. The poet himself has proved craven-hearted in this, as we shall see. He, too, sets up insurmountable barriers between the divine and the human, and thereby weakens both his religious and his moral convictions. His moral inspiration is greatest just where his religious enthusiasm is most intense. In Rabbi Ben Ezra, The Death in the Desert, and The Ring and the Book, there prevails a constant sense of the community of God and man within the realm of goodness; and the world itself, “with its dread machinery of sin and sorrow,” is made to join the great conspiracy, whose purpose is at once the evolution of man’s character, and the realization of the will of God.
“So, the All-Great, were the All-Loving
too—
So, through the thunder comes a human
voice
Saying, ’O heart I made, a heart
beats here!
Face, my hands fashioned, see it in myself!
Thou hast no power nor may’st conceive
of mine,
But love I gave thee, with myself to love,
And thou must love Me who have died for
thee.’"[A]
[Footnote A: An Epistle from Karshish.]