ashore systematically misled into the belief that the sailor is an object of charity, and that it is necessary to subscribe continually and liberally to provide him with food and shelter when ashore?  Most of the contributors would be surprised to know that the cost of board and lodging at the “home” is precisely the same as it is outside, and much higher than a landsman of the same grade can live for in better style.  With the exception of the sleeping accommodation, most men prefer the boarding-house, where, if they preserve the same commercial status which is a Sine Qua non at the “home,” they are treated like gentlemen; but in what follows lies the essential difference, and the reason for this outburst of mine, smothered in silence for years.  An “outward bounder”—­that is, a man whose money is exhausted and who is living upon the credit; of his prospective advance of pay—­is unknown at the “home.”  No matter what the condition of things is in the shipping world; though the man may have fought with energy to get his discharge accepted among the crowd at the “chain-locker;” though he be footsore and weary with “looking for a ship,” when his money is done, out into the street he must go, if haply he may find a speculative boarding-master to receive him.  This act, although most unlikely in appearance, is often performed; and though the boarding-master, of course, expects to recoup himself out of the man’s advance note, it is none the less as merciful as the action of the “home” authorities is merciless.  Of course a man may go to the “straw house,” or, as it is grandiloquently termed, the “destitute seaman’s asylum,” where for a season he will be fed on the refuse from the “home,” and sheltered from the weather.  But the ungrateful rascals do not like the “straw house,” and use very bad language about it.

The galling thing about the whole affair is that the “sailors’ home” figures in certain official publications as a charity, which must be partially supported by outside contributions.  It may be a charitable institution, but it certainly is not so to the sailor, who pays fully for everything he receives.  The charity is bestowed upon a far different class of people to merchant Jack.  Let it be granted that a man is sober and provident, always getting a ship before his money is all gone, he will probably be well content at the home, although very few seamen like to be reminded ashore of their sea routine, as the manner of the home is.  If the institution does not pay a handsome dividend, with its clothing shops and refreshment bars, as well as the boarding-house lousiness on such a large scale, only one inference can be fairly drawn—­there must be something radically wrong with the management.