“We feel a comfortable sense of satisfaction in the thought that The Lantern will never fail to shed the light of its loyal approval upon any unworthy act by which our country shall secure an adequate and permanent advantage.  When the great heart of England is stirred by quick cupidity to profitable crime, far be it from us to lift our palms in deprecation.  In the wrangle for existence nations, equally with individuals, work by diverse means to a common end—­the spoiling of the weak; and when by whatever of outrage we have pushed a feeble competitor to the wall, in Heaven’s name let us pin him fast and relieve his pockets of the material good to which, in bestowing it upon him, the bountiful Lord has invited our thieving hand.  But these Ashantee women were not worth garroting.  Their fal-lals, precious to them, are worthless to us; the entire loot fetched only L11,000—­of which sum the man who brought home the trinkets took a little more than four halves.  We submit that with practiced agents in every corner of the world and a watchful government at home this great commercial nation might dispose of its honor to better advantage.”

With the candor of repentance it may now be confessed that, however unscrupulous it may be abroad, a government which tolerates this kind of criticism cannot rightly be charged with tyranny at home.

By way (as I supposed) of gratitude to M. Rochefort for the use of the title of his defunct journal it had been suggested by Mr. Mortimer that he be given a little wholesome admonition here and there in the paper and I had cheerfully complied.  M. Rochefort had escaped from New Caledonia some months before.  A disagreeable cartoon was devised for his discomfort and he received a number of such delicate attentions as that following, which in the issue of July 15th greeted him on his arrival in England along with his distinguished compatriot, M. Pascal Grousset: 

“M.  Rochefort is a gentleman who has lost his standing.  There have been greater falls than his.  Kings before now have become servitors, honest men bandits, thieves communists.  Insignificant in his fortunes as in his abilities, M. Rochefort, who was never very high, is not now very low—­he has avoided the falsehood of extremes:  never quite a count, he is now but half a convict.  Having missed the eminence that would have given him calumniation, he is also denied the obscurity that would bring misconstruction.  He is not even a miserable; he is a person.  It is curious to note how persistently this man has perverted his gifts.  With talents that might have corrupted panegyric, he preferred to refine detraction; fitted to disgrace the salon, he has elected to adorn the cell; the qualities that would have endeared him to a blackguard he has wasted upon Pascal Grousset.