What then?  Is there any remedy short of Prohibition?  We believe not.

CHAPTER XVIII.

PROHIBITION.

It has taken nearly half a century to convince the people that only in total abstinence lies any hope of cure for the drunkard.  When this doctrine was first announced, its advocates met with opposition, ridicule and even insult.  Now it has almost universal acceptance.  The effort to hold an inebriate’s appetite in check by any restriction that included license, has, in all cases, proved so signal a failure, that the “letting down,” or “tapering off” process has been wholly abandoned in inebriate asylums.  There is no hope, as we have said, but in complete abstinence.

NO REMEDY BUT PROHIBITION.

Is there any other means of cure for national drunkenness?  The remedy of license has been found as valueless for the whole people as restriction for the individual.  Appetite, when once depraved, becomes, in the individual, lawless, exacting and unscrupulous; not hesitating to trample on duty, justice, humanity and every public and private virtue.  It will keep no faith; it will hold to no pledge, however solemnly taken.  It must be wholly denied or it will be wholly master.

As in the individual, so in the nation, State or community.  Appetite loses nothing by aggregation; nor are the laws of its action changed.  If not denied by prohibition in the State, as by total abstinence in the individual, it will continue to entail upon the people loss and ruin and unutterable woes.  License, restrictive permission, tax, all will be vain in the future as they have been in the past.  There is no hope, no help, no refuge in anything but Prohibition!

And here we art met by two questions, fairly and honestly asked.  First.  Is prohibition right in the abstract as a legislative measure?  Second.  Can prohibitory laws be enforced, and will they cure the evil of drunkenness?

First, as to the question of legislative action.  Can the State forbid the sale of intoxicating drinks as a beverage without violating the natural right of certain citizens, engaged in the manufacture and sale of these articles, to supply them to customers who wish to purchase?

We answer, that no man has a natural right to do wrong; that is, to engage in any pursuit by which he makes gain out of loss and injury to his neighbor.  The essential principle of government is the well-being of the people.  It guarantees to the weak, security against the strong; it punishes evil doers, and seeks to protect its citizens from the evil effects of that unscrupulous selfishness in the individual which would trample on the rights of all the rest in its pursuit of money or power.