the peasants; but we know what the Emancipation really
was. The best land was taken away and the taxes
were increased, lest the muzhik should get fat and
lazy. The Tsar is himself the richest landed
proprietor and manufacturer in the country. He
not only robs us as much as he pleases, but he has
sold into slavery (by forming a national debt) our
children and grandchildren. He takes our sons
as soldiers, shuts them up in barracks so that they
should not see their brother-peasants, and hardens
their hearts so that they become wild beasts, ready
to rend their parents. The nobles and traders
likewise rob the poor peasants. In short, all
the upper classes have invented a bit of cunning machinery
by which the muzhik is made to pay for their pleasures
and luxuries. The people will one day rise and
break this machinery to pieces. When that day
comes they must break every part of it, for if one
bit escapes destruction all the other parts of it
will immediately grow up again. All the force
is on the side of the peasants, if they only knew how
to use it. Knowledge will come in time. They
will then destroy this machine, and perceive that
the only real remedy for all social evils is brotherhood.
People should live like brothers, having no mine and
thine, but all things in common. When we have
created brotherhood, there will be no riches and no
thieves, but right and righteousness without end.
In conclusion, Stepan addresses a word to “the
torturers”: “When the people rise,
the Tsar will send troops against us, and the nobles
and capitalists will stake their last rouble on the
result. If they do not succeed, they must not
expect any quarter from us. They may conquer us
once or twice, but we shall at last get our own, for
there is no power that can withstand the whole people.
Then we shall cleanse the country of our persecutors,
and establish a brotherhood in which there will be
no mine and thine, but all will work for the common
weal. We shall construct no cunning machinery,
but shall pluck up evil by the roots, and establish
eternal justice!”
The above-mentioned distinction between Propaganda
and Agitation, which plays a considerable part in
revolutionary literature, had at that time more theoretical
than practical importance. The great majority
of those who took an active part in the movement confined
their efforts to indoctrinating the masses with Socialistic
and subversive ideas, and sometimes their methods
were rather childish. As an illustration I may
cite an amusing incident related by one of the boldest
and most tenacious of the revolutionists, who subsequently
acquired a certain sense of humour. He and a
friend were walking one day on a country road, when
they were overtaken by a peasant in his cart.
Ever anxious to sow the good seed, they at once entered
into conversation with the rustic, telling him that
he ought not to pay his taxes, because the tchinovniks
robbed the people, and trying to convince him by quotations