Table 6.—­Time given to language, composition, and grammar
========================================================

| Hours per year | Per cent of grade time
|-----------------------|------------------------
Grade | Cleveland | 50 cities | Cleveland | 50 cities
--------------------------------------------------------

1 | 79 | 75 | 10.9 | 8.6
2 | 95 | 79 | 10.8 | 8.7
3 | 79 | 94 | 9.0 | 10.3
4 | 104 | 106 | 11.8 | 10.9
5 | 120 | 116 | 13.6 | 12.0
6 | 120 | 118 | 13.6 | 12.2
7 | 125 | 134 | 14.3 | 13.7
8 | 125 | 142 | 14.3 | 14.1
========================================================

Total | 847 | 864 | 12.3 | 11.4
--------------------------------------------------------

In the teaching of grammar too much stress is placed on forms and relations.  Of course it is expected that this knowledge will be of service to the pupils in their everyday expression.  But such practical application of the knowledge is not the thing toward which the work actually looks.  The end really achieved is rather the ability to recite well on textbook grammar, and to pass good examinations in the subject.  In classes visited the thing attempted was being done in a relatively effective way.  And when judged in the light of the kind of education considered best 20 years ago, the work is of a superior character.

As a matter of fact, facility in oral and written expression is, like everything else, mainly developed through much practice.  The form and style of expression are perfected mainly through the conscious and unconscious imitation of good models.  Technical grammar plays, or should play, the relatively minor role of assisting students to eliminate and to avoid certain types of error.  Since grammar has this perfectly practical function to perform, probably only those things needed should be taught; but more important still, everything taught should be constantly put to use by the pupils in their oversight of their own speech and writing.  Only as knowledge is put to work, is it really learned or assimilated.  The schools should require much oral and written expression of the pupils, and should enforce constant watchfulness of their own speech on the part of the pupils.  It is possible to require pupils to go over all of their written work and to examine it, before handing it in, in the light of all the grammatical rules they have learned.  It is also possible for pupils to guard consciously against known types of error which they are accustomed to make in their oral recitations.  Every recitation in whatever subject provides opportunity for such training in habits of watchfulness.  Only as the pupil is brought to do it himself, without prompting on the part of the teacher, is his education accomplished.