complexion Watts was one of the first to transfer to canvas, Miss Mary Anderson, and Miss Dorothy Maccallum, were all triumphantly depicted.  He will be known, however, as the citizen portrait-painter of the nineteenth century, who preserved for us not merely the form, but the spirit of some of the greatest men of his day.  Lord Tennyson sat three times.  In 1859 the poet was shown in the prime of life, his hair and beard ruffled, his look determined.  In 1864 we had another canvas—­“the moonlight portrait”; the face is that of Merlin, meditative, thoughtful.  As you look at it the features stand out with great clearness, the distance of the laurels behind his head can be estimated almost precisely, while seen through them is the gleam of the moon upon the distant water.  The 1890 portrait, in scholastic robes, with grizzled beard, and hair diminished, is Tennyson the mystic, and reminds us of his “Ancient Sage”—­

        “... for more than once when I
    Sat all alone, revolving in myself
    The word that is the symbol of myself,
    The Mortal limit of the self was loosed
    And passed into the Nameless, as a cloud
    Melts into heaven.”

The portrait of John L. Motley, the American Minister to England in 1869, and author of “The Rise of the Dutch Republic,” is one of the most successful paintings of handsome men; Watts here depicts perfectly the “spiritual body” of strength, purity, and appeal; the eyes are deepest blue, and the hair the richest brown.  In this case the artist has, as he was so prone, fallen into symbolism even in portraiture, for we can trace in the background a faint picture of an old-time fighting ship.

Another classic portrait, so different to that by Whistler, is of Thomas Carlyle.  The sage of Chelsea sits ruffled and untidy, with his hands resting on the head of a stick, and his features full of power.  He seems protesting against the few hours’ idleness, and anxious to get back to the strenuous life.  The sitter was good enough to say that the portrait was of “a mad labourer”—­not an unfair criticism of a very good portrait.

The Biblical Paintings are, as before said, in partial fulfilment of the frustrated scheme of “Cosmos.”  “Eve Repentant,” in an attitude so typical of grief, is perhaps the most beautiful; it is one of a trilogy, the others being “She shall be called Woman,” and “Eve Tempted.”  It is singular that in these three canvases the painter avoids the attempt to draw the face of the mother of the race.  In the first the face is upturned, covered in shadow; in the second it is hid from view by the leaves of the forbidden tree, while in the third Eve turns her back and hides her weeping face with her arms.  This habit of Watts to obscure the face is observed in “The Shuddering Angel,” Judgment in “Time, Death, and Judgment,” in “Love and Death,” “Sic Transit,” “Great Possessions,” and some others.  Often indeed a picture speaks as much of what is not seen as of what is seen.