God’s demand, then, is reasonable.  He would have us feel before Him as much shame as we feel before men, the same kind of shame—­shame with the same blush and burning in it, not shame of any sublimated, fictitious kind.  He desires us individually to take thought, and to say to ourselves:  “Suppose a man had proved against me even a small part of what is proved against me by God:  Suppose some wise, just, and honourable man had said of me and believed such things as God has said:  suppose he had said, and said truly, that I had robbed him, betrayed trust, and was unworthy of his friendship, would the shame be no more poignant than that which I feel when God denounces me?” How trifling are the causes which make us blush before our fellows:  a little awkwardness, the slightest accident which makes us appear blundering, some scarcely perceptible incongruity of dress, an infinitesimal error in manner or in accent—­anything is enough to make us uneasy in the company of those we esteem.  It is God’s reasonable demand that for those gross iniquities and bold transgressions of which we are conscious we should manifest some heartfelt shame—­a shame that does not wholly lack the poignancy and agitation of the confusion we feel in presence of human judgment.

2. The consequent possibility of accepting the pardon of sin with too light a heart. To ask for pardon Without real shame is to treat sin lightly; and to treat sin lightly is to treat God lightly.  Nothing more effectually deadens the moral sense than:  the habit of asking pardon without a due sense of the evil of sin.  We ask God to forgive us our debts, and we do so in so inconsiderate a spirit that we go straightway and contract heavier debts.  The friend who repays the ten pounds we had lent him and asks for a new loan of twenty, does not commend himself to our approval.  He is no better who accepts pardon as if it cost God nothing.

3. The means of preventing a too light-hearted acceptance of pardon. Under the ceremonial prescriptions enjoined on Miriam lay some moral efficacy.  A person left for a full week without the camp must, in separation from accustomed companionship, intercourse, and occupations, have been thrown upon his or her own thoughts.  No doubt it is often while engaged in our ordinary occupations that the strongest light is flashed upon our true spiritual condition.  It is while in the company of other people that we catch hints which seem to interpret to us our past and reveal to us our present state.  But these glimpses and hints often pass without result, because we do not find leisure to follow them up.  There must be some kind of separation from the camp if we are to know ourselves, some leisure gained for quiet reflection.  It is due to God that we be at some pains to ascertain with precision our actual relation to His will.