This was damaging enough.  But far more serious was the “communicated” article on the next page—­“from a correspondent”—­on which the “leader” was based.

Marsham saw at once that the “correspondent” was really Barrington himself, and that the article was wholly derived from the conversation which had taken place at Tallyn, and from the portions of Ferrier’s letters, which Marsham had read or summarized for the journalist’s benefit.

The passage in particular which Ferrier’s dying hand had marked—­he recalled the gleam in Barrington’s black eyes as he had listened to it, the instinctive movement in his powerful hand, as though to pounce, vulturelike, on the letter—­and his own qualm of anxiety—­his sudden sense of having gone too far—­his insistence on discretion.

Discretion indeed!  The whole thing was monstrous treachery.  He had warned the man that these few sentences were not to be taken literally—­that they were, in fact, Ferrier’s caricature of himself and his true opinion.  “You press on me a particular measure,” they said, in effect, “you expect the millennium from it.  Well, I’ll tell you what you’ll really get by it!”—­and then a forecast of the future, after the great Bill was passed, in Ferrier’s most biting vein.

The passage in the Herald was given as a paraphrase, or, rather, as a kind of reductio ad absurdum of one of Ferrier’s last speeches in the House.  It was, in truth, a literal quotation from one of the letters.  Barrington had an excellent memory.  He had omitted nothing.  The stolen sentences made the point, the damning point, of the article.  They were not exactly quoted as Ferrier’s, but they claimed to express Ferrier more closely than he had yet expressed himself.  “We have excellent reason to believe that this is, in truth, the attitude of Mr. Ferrier.”  How, then, could a man of so cold and sceptical a temper continue to lead the young reformers of the party?  The Herald, with infinite regret, made its bow to its old leader, and went over bag and baggage to the camp of Lord Philip, who, Marsham could not doubt, had been in close consultation with the editor through the whole business.

Again and again, as the train sped on, did Marsham go back over the fatal interview which had led to these results.  His mind, full of an agony of remorse he could not still, was full also of storm and fury against Barrington.  Never had a journalist made a more shameful use of a trust reposed in him.

With torturing clearness, imagination built up the scene in the garden:  the arrival of Broadstone’s letter; the hand of the stricken man groping for the newspaper; the effort of those pencilled lines; and, finally, that wavering mark, John Ferrier’s last word on earth.

If it had, indeed, been meant for him, Oliver—­well, he had received it; the dead man had reached out and touched him; he felt the brand upon him; and it was a secret forever between Ferrier and himself.