judge,” said the twinkling Chief Secretary.
“He told the story himself with great glee, and
here it is. Mr Justice Wylie, the last, and one
of the best judges appointed in Ireland, was riding
on a tramcar to a hunting meet. When he got to
the end of his ride, there were some policemen on duty,
and they did use a word which, I trust, no hon.
Member of this House will ever use in calling him
down from the tram. They did him no harm.
He treated it as a joke, and he would be the man most
surprised to find it quoted in the House and in the
Observer as an example of the decadence of
the Irish police.” I agree with Sir Hamar.
A joke is a joke, and many Irishmen, unlike Mr Justice
Wylie, are unduly thin-skinned. The only criticism
I would make on Sir Hamar Greenwood’s idea of
a joke is that he appears to suggest that it would
have been less funny if the Black-and-Tans had done
the judge some harm. I should have expected him
rather to dilate on the attractions of life in the
Irish police force for men with a sense of humour.
Suppose the judge had been robbed of his watch, or
had had his front teeth broken with the muzzle of
a revolver like the University Professor at Cork,
would not that have made the incident still funnier?
Suppose he had been carried round as a hostage on
a motor-lorry, or shot with a bucket over his head,
as has happened to other innocent men, would it not
have been a theme for Aristophanes, who got so much
fun out of the idea of one person’s being beaten
in mistake for another?
I am confident that distinguished Englishmen will
behave in the spirit of Mr Justice Wylie, when there
is an outbreak of humour among the English police.
Mr Justice Darling will, no doubt, enjoy himself hugely
on the day on which an armed policeman first holds
up his motor-car, and addresses him: “’Ullo,
you blasted old Bolshevik, come off the perch, and
quick about it, and put up the ’Idden ’And!”
There are some judges who would complain to the Home
Office, if such a thing happened to them. Mr
Justice Darling, however, has a keen sense of humour.
I feel certain that on arriving in Court after his
experiences he would tell the story with great glee.
He would turn up his face sideways, as he does when
he is amused, and say to the jury: “A most
amusing thing happened to me this morning, by the way
...” There is no end, indeed, to the directions
in which a police force saturated with the Greenwoodian
sense of fun might add to the gaiety of nations.
They might arm themselves with squirts, and laughing
Cabinet ministers would have to duck as they passed
down Whitehall in order to avoid a drenching.
Pluffing peas at the bishops on their way to the House
of Lords would also be good sport, so long as they
did not really hurt any of them. To bash the
Lord Chancellor’s hat over his eyes would be
going too far, as it involves a money loss, but a harmless
blow on the crown with a bladder would be rather amusing.
It would also be amusing if a number of policemen