waistcoats. But the particular egg of which I
speak is one of the beautiful white things—like
snow, or a breaking wave, or teeth. So certain
am I, however, that neither it nor the little brown
one will ever come my way, while there is a woman or
a child or a guest to prevent it, that when I am asked
how I like the eggs to be done I make it a point to
say “poached” or “fried.”
It gives me at least a chance of getting one of the
sort of eggs I like by accident. As for poached
eggs, I agree. There are nine ways of poaching
eggs, and each of them is worse than the other.
Still, there is one good thing about poached eggs:
one is never disappointed. One accepts a poached
egg like fate. There is no sitting on tenterhooks,
watching and waiting and wondering, as there is in
regard to boiled eggs. I admit that most of the
difficulties associated with boiled eggs could be
got over by the use of egg-cosies—appurtenances
of the breakfast table that stirred me to the very
depths of delight when I first set eyes on them as
a child. It was at a mothers’ meeting, where
I was the only male present. Thousands of women
sat round me, sewing and knitting things for a church
bazaar. Much might be written about egg-cosies.
Much might be said for and much against. They
would be effective, however only if it were regarded
as a point of honour not to look under the cosy before
choosing the egg. And the sense of honour, they
say, is a purely masculine attribute. Children
never had it, and women have lost it. I do not
know a single woman whom I would trust not to look
under an egg cosy—not, at least, unless
she were forbidden eggs by the doctor. In that
case, any egg would seem delicious, and she would
seize the nearest, irrespective of class or colour.
This may not explain the connection between eggs and
Easter. But then neither does The Encyclopædia
Britannica. I have looked up both the article
on eggs and the article on Easter, and in neither of
them can I find anything more relevant than such remarks
as that “the eggs of the lizard are always white
or yellowish, and generally soft-shelled; but the
geckos and the green lizards lay hard-shelled eggs”
or “Gregory of Tours relates that in 577 there
was a doubt about Easter.” In order to
learn something about Easter eggs one has to turn to
some such work as The Dictionary of Phrase and
Fable, which tells us that “the practice
of presenting eggs to our friends at Easter is Magian
or Persian, and bears allusion to the mundane egg,
for which Ormuzd and Ahriman were to contend till
the consummation of all things.” The advantage
of reading Tit-Bits is that one gets to know
hundreds of things like that. The advantage of
not reading Tit-Bits is that one is so ignorant
of them that a piece of information of this sort is
as fresh and unexpected as the morning’s news
every Easter Monday. Next Easter, I feel sure,
I shall look it up again. I shall have forgotten
all about the mundane egg, even if Ormuzd and Ahriman
have not. I shall be thinking more about my breakfast
egg. What a piece of work is a man! And
yet many profound things might be said about eggs,
mundane or otherwise. I wish I could have thought
of them.