[62:1] S.R. i. p. 259 f.

[62:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342 [ibid. p, 65 f.]

[62:3] S.R. i. p. 259.

[63:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342.  In a note Dr. Lightfoot states that my references to Lipsius are to his earlier works, where he still maintains the priority and genuineness of the Curetonian Epistles.  Certainly they are so:  but in the right place, two pages further on, I refer to the writings in which he rejects the authenticity, whilst still maintaining his previous view of the priority of these letters [ibid. p. 66].

[64:1] Calvin’s expressions are:  “Nihil naeniis illis, quae sub Ignatii nomine editae sunt, putidius.  Quo minus tolerabilis est eorum impudentia, qui talibus larvis ad fallendum se instruunt” (Inst.  Chr.  Rel. i. 13, Sec. 39).

[64:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342.

[64:3] Op.  Theolog. 1652, 11, p. 1085.

[64:4] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342 [ibid. p. 66].  Dr. Lightfoot refers to Pearson’s Vindiciae Ignat. p. 28 (ed.  Churton).

[65:1] Exam.  Concilii Tridentim, 1614, i. p. 85 (misprinted 89).

[65:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 343 [ibid. p. 67].

[67:1] Critici Sacri, lib. ii cap. 1; Op.  Theolog. 1652, ii. p. 1086.

[67:2] Vind.  Ignat. 1672, p. 14 f.; Jacobson, Patr.  Apost. i. p. xxxviii.

[67:3] Op de Theolog.  Dogmat., De Eccles.  Hierarch. v. 8 Sec. 1, edit.  Venetiis, 1757, vol. vii.

[68:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 343 f. [ibid. p. 67 f.]

[70:1] Die Kirche im ap.  Zeit. p. 322.

[70:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 344 f. [ibid. p. 69.]

[72:1] K.G. 1842, 1. p. 327, Anm. 1.

[73:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 345 [ibid. p. 69].

[75:1] Einl.  N.T. pp. 144 f., 233.

[78:1] Contemporary Review, January 1875, p. 183 [ibid. p. 51].

[78:2] Ibid., February 1875, p. 346 [ibid. p. 71].

[79:1] Theolog.  Quartalschrift, 1851, p. 389 ff.

[79:2] Hippolytus and his Age, 1852, i. p. 60, note, iv. p. vi ff.

[79:3] Gesch. d.  V. Isr. vii. p. 321, Anm. 1.

[80:1] Patr.  Apost.  Proleg. 1863, p. xxx.

[80:2] Patr.  Apost. ed. 4th, 1855.  In a review of Denzinger’s work in the Theolog.  Quartalschrift, 1849, p. 683 ff., Hefele devotes eight lines to the Armenian version (p. 685 f.)

[80:3] Hippolytus, 1852, i. p. 60, note.  Cf. iv. p. vi ff.

[81:1] S.R. i. p. 264.

[81:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 347 [ibid. p. 72].