[49:1] I regret very much that some ambiguity in my language (S.R. i. p. 483) should have misled, and given Dr. Lightfoot much trouble.  I used the word “quotation” in the sense of a use of the Epistle of Peter, and not in reference to any one sentence in Polycarp.  I trust that in this edition I have made my meaning clear.

[50:1] Cf. H.E. iii. 3, 4, 18, 24, 25, &c. &c.

[50:2] Ibid. ii. 15, vi. 14.

[50:3] Ibid. v. 8.

[50:4] Ibid. vi. 25.

[51:1] Contemporary Review, January 1875, p. 181 [ibid. p. 48].

[51:2] By a slip of the pen Dr. Lightfoot refers to Irenaeus, Adv.  Haer. iii. 3, 4.  It should be ii. 22, 5.

[51:3] Ibid. p. 181.

[51:4] H.E. iii, 24.

[52:1] H.E. ii. 23.

[52:2] Ibid. iii. 11.

[52:3] Ibid. 16.

[52:4] Ibid. 19, 20.

[52:5] Ibid. 32.

[52:6] Ibid. iv. 8.

[52:7] Ibid. 11.

[52:8] Ibid. iv. 22.

[53:1] H.E. ii. 15.

[53:2] Ibid. vii. 25.

[54:1] H.E. iii. 18.

[54:2] Ibid. 19, 20.

[54:3] Ibid. 20.

[54:4] Ibid. 20.

[54:5] Ibid. 23.

[54:6] Ibid. 24.

[55:1] I am much obliged to Dr. Lightfoot for calling my attention to the accidental insertion of the words “and the Apocalypse” (S.R. i. p. 433).  This was a mere slip of the pen, of which no use is made, and the error is effectually corrected by my own distinct statements.

[55:2] H.E. iii. 39.

[56:1] Contemporary Review, January 1875, p. 183 [ibid. p. 51].

[57:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 337 ff. [ibid. p. 59 ff.]

[58:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 339 [ibid. p. 62].

[59:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 340 [ibid. p. 63].

[59:2] S.R. i. p. 263 f.  I have introduced numbers for facility of reference.

[60:1] Dr. Lightfoot says in this volume:  “The reading ‘most’ is explained in the preface to that edition as a misprint” (p. 63, n. 2).  Not so at all.  “A slip of the pen” is a very different thing.

[60:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 341 [ibid. p. 64].

[61:1] Ueber d.  Urspr. u.s.w. des Christennamens, p. 7, Anm. 1.

[61:2] Zeitschr. wiss.  Theol. 1874, p. 211, Anm. 1.  I should have added that the priority which Lipsius still maintains is that of the text, as Dr. Lightfoot points out in his Apostolic Fathers (part ii. vol. i. 1885, p. 273, n. 1), and not of absolute origin; but this appears clearly enough in the quotations I have made.

[61:3] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 841 [ibid. p. 65].