After all these marks of public consequence, the reader may be surprised to learn that John Shakespeare, the father of the world’s greatest thinker and greatest poet, could not write his name!  Such was undoubtedly the fact; and I take pleasure in noting it, as showing, what is too apt to be forgotten in these bookish days, that men may know several things, and may have witty children, without being initiated in the mysteries of pen and ink.  In the borough records for 1565 is an order signed by nineteen aldermen and burgesses, calling upon John Wheler to undertake the office of Bailiff.  Of these signers thirteen are markmen, and among them are the names of George Whately, then Bailiff, Roger Sadler, head-alderman, and John Shakespeare.  So that there was nothing remarkable in his not being able to wield a pen.  As Bailiff of Stratford, he was ex officio a justice of the peace; and two warrants are extant, granted by him in December, 1568, for the arrest of John Ball and Richard Walcar on account of debts; both of them bearing witness that “he had a mark to himself, like an honest, plain-dealing man.”  Several other cases in point are met with at later periods; some of which show that his wife stood on the same footing with him in this respect.  In October, 1579, John and Mary Shakespeare executed a deed and bond for the transfer of their interest in certain property; both of which are subscribed with their several marks, and sealed with their respective seals.

John Shakespeare’s good fortune seems to have reached its height about the year 1575, after which time we meet with many clear tokens of his decline.  It is not improbable that his affairs may have got embarrassed from his having too many irons in the fire.  The registry of the Court of Record, from 1555 to 1595, has a large number of entries respecting him, which show him to have been engaged in a great variety of transactions, and to have had more litigation on his hands than would now be thought either creditable or safe.  But, notwithstanding his decline of fortune, we have proofs as late as 1592 that he still retained the confidence and esteem of his fellow-citizens.  From that time forward, his affairs were doubtless taken care of by one who, as we shall see hereafter, was much interested not to let them suffer, and also well able to keep them in good trim.  He was buried September 8, 1601; so that, supposing him to have reached his majority when first heard of in 1552, he must have passed the age of threescore and ten.

On the maternal side, our Poet’s lineage was of a higher rank, and may be traced further back.  His mother was Mary Arden, a name redolent of old poetry and romance.  The family of Arden was among the most ancient in Warwickshire.  Their history, as given by Dugdale, spreads over six centuries.  Sir John Arden was squire of the body to Henry the Seventh; and he had a nephew, the son of a younger brother, who was page of the bedchamber to the same