* * * * *

Some hints towards the part of Theseus and Hippolyta appear to have been taken from The Knight’s Tale of Chaucer.  The same poet’s Legend of Thisbe of Babylon, and Golding’s translation of the same story from Ovid, probably furnished the matter of the Interlude.  So much as relates to Bottom and his fellows evidently came fresh from Nature as she had passed under the Poet’s eye.  The linking of these clowns with the ancient tragic tale of Pyramus and Thisbe, so as to draw the latter within the region of modern farce, is not less original than droll.  How far it may have expressed the Poet’s judgment touching the theatrical doings of the time, were perhaps a question more curious than profitable.  The names of Oberon, Titania, and Robin Goodfellow were made familiar by the surviving relics of Gothic and Druidical mythology; as were also many particulars in their habits, mode of life, and influence in human affairs.  Hints and allusions scattered through many preceding writers might be produced, showing that the old superstition had been grafted into the body of Christianity, where it had shaped itself into a regular system, so as to mingle in the lore of the nursery, and hold an influential place in the popular belief.  Some reports of this ancient Fairydom are choicely translated into poetry by Chaucer in The Wife of Bath’s Tale.

But, though Chaucer and others had spoken about the fairy nation, it was for Shakespeare to let them speak for themselves:  until he clothed their life in apt forms, their thoughts in fitting words, they but floated unseen and unheard in the mental atmosphere of his fatherland.  So that on this point there need be no scruple about receiving Hallam’s statement of the matter:  “A Midsummer-Night’s Dream is, I believe, altogether original in one of the most beautiful conceptions that ever visited the mind of a poet,—­the fairy machinery.  A few before him had dealt in a vulgar and clumsy manner with popular superstitions; but the sportive, beneficent, invisible population of the air and earth, long since established in the creed of childhood, and of those simple as children, had never for a moment been blended with ‘human mortals’ among the personages of the drama.”  How much Shakespeare did as the friend and saviour of those sweet airy frolickers of the past from the relentless mowings of Time, has been charmingly set forth in our day in Hood’s Plea of the Midsummer Fairies.

What, then, are the leading qualities which the Poet ascribes to these ideal or fanciful beings?  Coleridge says he is “convinced that Shakespeare availed himself of the title of this play in his own mind, and worked upon it as a dream throughout.”  This remark no doubt rightly hits the true genius of the piece; and on no other ground can its merits be duly estimated.  The whole play is indeed a sort of ideal dream; and it is from the fairy personages