compare them together. The Greeks were doubtless
better armed, having the use of metals; but it seemed
plain, from the writings of Homer, in spite of poetical
embellishment, that their mode of fighting was
irregular, and their arms simple, like those of
Otaheite. The united efforts of Greece against
Troy, in remote antiquity, could not be much more considerable
than the armament of Otoo against the isle of Eimea;
and the boasted mille carinae were probably
not more formidable than a fleet of large canoes,
which require from fifty to an hundred and twenty men,
to paddle them. The navigation of the Greeks,
in those days, was not more extensive than that
which is practised by the Otaheitans at present, being
confined to short passages from island to island; and
as the stars at night directed the mariners through
the Archipelago at that time, so they still continue
to guide others in the Pacific Ocean. The Greeks
were brave; but the numerous wounds of the Otaheitan
chiefs, are all proofs of their spirit and prowess.
It seems to be certain, that in their battles
they rouse themselves into a kind of phrenzy, and
that their bravery is a violent fit of passion.
From Homer’s battles, it is evident, that
the heroism which produced the wonders he records,
was exactly of the same nature. Let us for a moment
be allowed to carry this comparison still farther.
The heroes of Homer are represented to us as men
of supernatural size and force. The Otaheitan
chiefs, compared to the common people, are so much
superior in stature and elegance of form, that
they look like a different race. It requires
a more than ordinary quantity of food to satisfy stomachs
of unusual dimensions. Accordingly we find,
that the mighty men at the siege of Troy, and
the chiefs of Otaheite, are both famous for eating,
and it appears that pork was a diet no less admired
by the Greeks, than it is by the Otaheitans at
this day. Simplicity of manners is observable
in both nations; and their domestic character is hospitable,
affectionate, and humane. There is even a similarity
in their political constitution. The chiefs
of districts at Otaheite are powerful princes,
who have not more respect for Otoo than the Greek
heroes had for the “king of men;” and
the common people are so little noticed in the
Iliad, that they appear to have had no greater consequence,
than the towtows in the South Seas. In short,
I believe the similitude might be traced in many
other instances; but it was my intention only
to hint at it, and not to abuse the patience of my
readers. What I have here said is sufficient
to prove, that men in a similar state of civilization
resemble each other more than we are aware of,
even in the most opposite extremes of the world.”—G.F.—
This gentleman guards against any more particular
deductions from such resemblance as he has now
noticed, by adverting to the havoc made in history
by the modern itch for tracing pedigrees, alluding
especially to the affinity imagined betwixt the