-------------------------------------------------------

--------------
| Total Cost    | Total        | Total         |
| of all        | Salaries of  | Native        |
| Evangelistic  | all Paid     | Contribution, |
Province.| and           | Native       | excluding     | Remarks and
| Pastoral      | Evangelistic | School or     | Conclusions.
| Work, Men     | Workers,     | Hospital      |
| and Material. | including    | Fees or       |
|               | Pastors.     | Donations.    |
------------------------------------------------------------

---------
|               |              |               |
------------------------------------------------------------

---------

[Footnote 1:  In Dr. Eugene Stock’s “History of the C.M.S.,” vol. ii., p. 420, we are told that “In 1863,... 400 families raised 1371 rupees, equal then to L137.  These families consisted mainly of labourers earning (say) 2s. a week; so that a corresponding sum for 400 families of English labourers earning 12s. a week would be L137 x 6 = L822, or over L2 a year from each family.  A few years later, taking the whole of the C.M.S. districts in Tinnevelly and reckoning catechumens as well as baptised Christians, their contributions were such that, supposing the whole thirty millions of people in England were poor labourers earning 12s. a week, and there were no other source of wealth, their corresponding contributions should amount to L6,000,000 per annum.”  Yet he says on the very next page that “It was not possible for the native Church, liberal as its contributions were, to maintain its pastors and meet its other expenses (he does not say what the other expenses were) entirely.  The society must necessarily help for a while....  This grant, in the first instance, had to be large enough to cover much more than half the expenditure.”

If this was the case in one part of a province, what would happen if we took the whole expense of all work carried on in a whole province or country and used that as a standard by which to test progress in self-support?]

Turning now from the force at work we must consider the force in training, for this is prophetic.  Let us then take first a table which shows the proportion in which students are being trained for pastoral and evangelistic work, for medical mission work, and for educational mission work, in the province or country, regardless of the place at which they are being trained, whether that place is inside or outside the area under consideration.  This ought to show us on what lines we may expect the work to develop in the near future.